Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4371718, member: 1673"] I see that at least [USER=4250]@BobbyJ[/USER] has the measure of what I am about. I do not do impassioned pleas. I am not an acolyte for any player, except when I think they might be unfairly treated. I often dislike impassioned pleas. Nor do I claim to be certain when I am not. I am not certain, for example, that Muhl will dominate the PG minutes, but I am certain that is bad news for UConn if she does not. What I am for is experience, both in the forms of eye tests and data, leading me to what I believe and not the other way around. My experience, my eye test, does not make Fudd an obviously better passer than Muhl. Comparing the experience embedded in assists data, of which Muhl has more than three times than Fudd, would be bogus and an example of abuse of data. Comparing the experience embedded in A/T is not abusing data. How is it so? A whole season is not statistically too small of a sample size. The BY is not just for impassioned pleas, but also for people to present reliable evidence, data, the experience of their eyes, in support of their conclusions. If you do not think that some data can be abused but some appropriate, so that any data I use is inappropriate and an abusive lure, then the real contention between us has nothing to do with a comparison between Fudd and Muhl. [/QUOTE]