RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,395
- Reaction Score
- 99,201
Me too, but Nika gets a covid year, if she wants it. Want it Nika, want it Nika!Man am I going to miss her after this season..
I do not agree with this perspective. The germane discussion to be had between the coaching staff and Nika is whether or not it helps or hurts the TEAM - and NOT about individual playing time during games, which is hoopsfan22's implication.When a player decides to stay an extra year it takes away from someone else, so after four years it's time to move on.
I agree with you. I'm sure the other players on the team would be over joyed to have NIKA back for one more year. With potential injuries possible, all on the team will get the playing time they will have to earn. NIKA is a proven and stellar player and it would have to be a PAIGE type player that would be denied playing time, and there is NO Paige type player in the near future.The UCONN team mentality is all team,now and forever, drilled into them by Geno and CD. GO NIKA!!!! GO HUSKIES!!!!!I do not agree with this perspective. The germane discussion to be had between the coaching staff and Nika is whether or not it helps or hurts the TEAM - and NOT about individual playing time during games, which is hoopsfan22's implication.
A secondary relevant discussion is whether or not it is beneficial to the player contemplating the extra year. Ideally, this should also involve the coaching staff.
Nika is a super positive influence on this team, whether she is on the court or on the bench.
It's a zero sum game. There are only 200 player-minutes available per game. Having an extra player means a younger player is getting less court time which slows their development. It also has an impact on leadership. Never mind the impact on recruiting.I do not agree with this perspective. The germane discussion to be had between the coaching staff and Nika is whether or not it helps or hurts the TEAM - and NOT about individual playing time during games, which is hoopsfan22's implication.
A secondary relevant discussion is whether or not it is beneficial to the player contemplating the extra year. Ideally, this should also involve the coaching staff.
Nika is a super positive influence on this team, whether she is on the court or on the bench.
Never mess with a Nika fest! Who did Dorka take away from?When a player decides to stay an extra year it takes away from someone else, so after four years it's time to move on.
It's about the TEAM. What type of impact can she contribute in '24-'25? Since she cannot earn any NIL, it will be interesting to see her WNBA draft position vs Europe WBB.It's a zero sum game. There are only 200 player-minutes available per game. Having an extra player means a younger player is getting less court time which slows their development. It also has an impact on leadership. Never mind the impact on recruiting.
Your last three sentences MIGHT be true for younger players at a non-Top 25 program, but is certainly NOT true for elite programs such as UConn. May I ask what criteria are you using to assess player development, much less to assess impacts on leadership and recruiting? Certainly not how many players reach AA, or how many play professionally, or how many go on to successful careers on or off the court after leaving UConn, are you?It's a zero sum game. There are only 200 player-minutes available per game. Having an extra player means a younger player is getting less court time which slows their development. It also has an impact on leadership. Never mind the impact on recruiting.
Minutes are mostly taken away from lesser players. We need more lesser players??When a player decides to stay an extra year it takes away from someone else, so after four years it's time to move on.