I think he had 9, 11, and 5, but the best stat was the 0 turnovers. He dialed it back enough to get more under control and become more effective. Kid is a heck of a rebounder. I'm not sure he will become a great pure shooter, but he could be a really good scorer and playmaker.
He's had his moments as a shooter, too - a little streaky. He was 4-12 today, but I think he was 0-4 on his last four shots (3 when the game was already wrapped up) and had a couple first-half threes pop out. But there are times this season he's hit little rhythm step back shots from 15-17 feet where I thought "NBA move" - in his very first game (Bryant?), he had a step back 3 that was beautiful, but I haven't seen him try to take a shot like that since (except maybe under duress late in a clock).
Like a lot of freshmen, it becomes a between the ears thing. The start of the second half against ECU was like the start of the game against West Virginia, where he took the game over for a short stretch doing absolutely everything - shooting, passing, rebounding, driving. Then when it stops becoming easy, when teams make adjustments and he makes mistakes, he loses some confidence and becomes more hesitant or defers. I think that's a normal part of being a freshman - you want to see flashes of how good they can be and accept that it's just not going to be there every night, except in the rarest of the rare. Then you fight your own brain a little - you force yourself to be aggressive, but it's not a confident aggressive, and it results in a bad play.
I did watch some of his attacking moves today and wonder how much better he'd be doing this year if we had some sort of combination of Giffey/Napier/Daniels out there with him spreading the floor. It's usually the help guy that gives him problems and it's harder to help off guys who can kill you from deep. ECU just wasn't very good at helping and DHam almost always had a nice seam to use.