Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Next year's starting lineup
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 2129882, member: 3535"] I don't agree overall. Gabby was pushed to the forward spot in which she is excelling now because she lacked the ability to shoot the ball consistently and has an obscene strength to offensive rebound. To take away her ability to offensive by sticking her outside in a zone is not helpful to Gabby or the team. As far as her being the shortest player, imo not relevant. Heck, Charles Barkley was actually 6-5 1/2. If he were to play with Magic Johnson would that mean one would want Magic to be in the post while Barkley outside because Magic is taller? Even if UCONN loses next game or two, haven't we put the "height" justification to rest as being irrelevant? We have been the best team in America with 5'11 and 6'1. Secondly players like Kia and Lou are taller than Gabby yet Gabby is a far superior player inside. Why take away the superiority Gabby has and put players who are tremendous shooters inside where the are less effective? Overall height will usually lose out over fundamentals. Not all the time ofc. But this year and what the Golden State Warriors have shown - height isn't the "be-all." Remember how many people were saying how much "Nat" was needed this year and that she should start. She definitely was needed this year and UCONN is not number 1 without her and maybe if she played sub-par we would have had 2-3 losses and not been the overall 1 seed. Nat has been huge this year vs certain teams but not the need that many claimed she needed to be - in order to be as good as what UCONN has been. I really do believe we'll need her though. As far as zone defense/ zone offense- imo you attack the zone with fundamentals. And the more fundamentals each player has - you make it harder for the opposing team to defend you. A basic offensive fundamental for all players is "the triple threat." That is when you face the basket you can pass, shoot, dribble. Because Gabby is not a three point shooter and range is suspect, by only focusing on "she can make pinpoint passes" minimizes her impact because she no longer si a triple threat. IMO there is no way Geno is going to go away from certain fundamentals to start a game if he doesn't have to. If she isn't much of a shooter and you have to rely on Gabby ot be a pinpoint passer from the outside while she already is a tremendous passer and terrific scorer on the inside, you have effectively taken a strength of her scoring away from the game along with her offensive rebounding. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,578
Messages
4,401,990
Members
10,216
Latest member
illini2013
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Next year's starting lineup
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom