Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="auror, post: 4908200, member: 1329"] He's admitted there is some correlation between teammates that can overrate others in his metric, but I don't believe UConn is a good example of that. There's been a good amount of data without each other (Karaban missed a game, Castle 6, Clingan 5) and this phenomenon is usually when there's 1 star that carries teammates (like Braden Smith being high partially due to Edey). UConn has a more balanced approach in both scoring and impact. You could argue the scheme is so good that it overrates the players, but that's a slightly different conversation and it takes good (and smart) players to make it work so well. But yeah, it's ludicrous that we went 18-2 in conference, so ludicrous results like this should be the end result. It's ludicrous we had a +17.2 scoring margin against a top 50 schedule, too. [/QUOTE]