Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
New transfer thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="CocoHusky, post: 3162787, member: 5823"] [B]Q:[/B] For example, why should a coach change automatically make a transfer eligible? Because the coach that recruited you and the one you agreed to play for is gone. You now have to make a decision if you want to play for someone who did not or might not have recruited you. [B]Q:[/B] Also, the losing school invested, supposedly, in the development of the player, why should they not have a say especially if that development is taken form them by a rival? [B]A:[/B] Because this is the rule for all other college students. Non-athletes transfer at a greater rate than NCAA athletes. When than bright young student in the Chemistry department at Mississippi State decides to transfer is there someone telling him or her no you can't go to Ole Miss? Should UCONN have been able to stop AEH from attending Mississippi States- you guys did ruin a perfect UCONN season. Should TN be able to say no to Westbrook because TN has a rivalry with UCONN-allegedly. [B]C: [/B]I would lean more toward an exception that considered playing time, if a player is not likely to play even a limited role in her present team game activities then should she be granted immediate eligibility. [B]R: [/B]I would oppose this. "Not likely to play even a limited role, should have been factored into the decision to attend that school in the first place not a transfer decision. My experience is that as part of the recruiting process there are candid discussions/projections of roles, starting, depth chart etc. If a player is not living up to their projected role why reward then? [B]C: [/B] Guess what I am saying is exceptions led to confusion and interpretation, either let all non graduate transfers be eligible or make them all sit out a year. [B]R:[/B] I agree that's why I proposing are black and white rules=no exceptions. [/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,423
Messages
4,395,732
Members
10,209
Latest member
gemini*trvl
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
New transfer thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom