Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tchalla1, post: 4788961, member: 9866"] AH, you have twisted and juxtaposed my statements so much, I am not going to even try to untangle them. I am not frustrated--please don't try to read my emotions. You may disagree with me and that's fine, but please do not try to devaluate and dismiss my position solely on the premise that I am being overly emotional and frustrated by it. What does your statement, "the opposing team aren't pros" mean? Are there not tall, talented women in the collegiate games? Either I did not explain sufficiently, or you purposely distorted my statements. What i mean by my figures is simply that 2-feet bunnies, putbacks and tip-ins by bigs ala Kardoso and Reese for example, are made at a higher percentage than our perimeter shots, and occur with more frequency with talented bigs on smaller teams. For example, if you were to shoot 8 0f 10 on alley oops and putbacks (which Kardoso often does), I would need to shoot 50 percent, 5 of 10 on 3s--50 percent-- to offset your 16 points off your higher percentage shots. How complex is that? Simple math. Additionally, we were outrounded in the NC State game, 41-29. To what do you attribute such a disparity? You who say it's not about size, have the right to do so--certainly it's more than just size, it's effort, it's tenacity and a willingness to win. But how are you saying my concerns about size are "unrealistic/exaggerated" when Geno and CD are saying pretty much the same thing? Are you listening to their pregame/postgame pressers? [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach