Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ZooCougar, post: 5076122, member: 296"] What’s funny is that the MWC likely had their eye on the bag of cash that the PAC 2 were sitting on and they were angling to get as much of it as possible through a continued scheduling arrangement. They ACTUALLY thought that they were in a dominant position. Instead the PAC-2 decides to drink the MWC’s milkshake and use that money to defray the cost of the exit fees of the MWC’s most valuable member institutions. End result? The MWC gets to swirl down the toilet just like the WAC did. Nice work geniuses. [/QUOTE]