Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kolumbo, post: 5093085, member: 4613"] I didn't give these 2 proposals much thought because I figured it would never happen. Reading through Project Rudy, for the 70 programs at the table here are some key bullet points. But I guess if you are not in the 70, you are out. There are too many similar level programs on both sides of the 70 split to just have a hard cut-off. UCF is in, USF is out. So this would really suck big time. [B][I]Relegation and promotion would occur within the 70 programs. Some current members of SEC and Big 10 could fall into Tier 3 and earn less than currently:[/I][/B] [LIST] [*]- Tier 1: the top 16 schools earn per-school revenue projections from $130 million in Year 4, escalating to $250 million in Year 12 (double the SEC and Big Ten’s current distribution rate). [*] [*]- Tier 2: the next 22 schools earn revenue of $60-$110 million (similar to the SEC and Big Ten current rates). [*] [*][I][B][B][I]- Tier 3: the last 32 schools earn projections of $30-$60 million (similar to the Big 12 and ACC rates).[/I][/B][/B][/I] [*] [*]The model offers a variety of ways to determine how to tier schools: the previous season’s results, perhaps, or an aggregate of results over a stretch of seasons. [I][B]The model also features a relegation and promotion system to pave a way for schools to move up and down the tiers. [/B][/I]However, one proposed model suggests having eight “permanent” members of Tier 1, a move presumably to placate the biggest brands in the sport. [/LIST] [URL unfurl="true"]https://smashcap.com/team/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/while-sec-and-big-ten-leaders-mull-major-changes-a-new-super-league-concept-could-radically-alter-college-sports-130031473.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach