Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="visitingcock, post: 4521604, member: 6872"] Yes, I agree. I think both NET and RPI are too complex. I keep it much simpler in my Boneyard Poll ballots. I look only at Quad one wins minus total losses. Even then, I wish it didn't have the weighted home/netural/away game distinction. I would rather the quads be a straight (1)-top 64, (l[I]ikely tournament team[/I]s) (2) 65-128, ([I]possible tournament team[/I]s) (3) 129-192,([I]unlikely tournament teams[/I]) and (4) the rest ( [I]almost "no way") tournament teams[/I]). But I'm too lazy to do the analysis each week. So I just go with the net quad One. My ranked team ignored by most is Columbia U which has 4 quad one wins and only two losses for a net winning record of 2 while a team like Oregon has a net winning record of minus 4. And Oregon hasn't played many more quad one teams. [/QUOTE]