Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Bone Dog, post: 4484963, member: 12088"] I find your comment mystifying… unless, of course, you’re not really replying to me at all. My point throughout this thread has been that NET rankings are unreliable early in the season (as in the case of LSU) but are likely to become more reliable later in the season. This is because NET does not take SoS into account as an independent factor. Your original point seemed to be that it doesn’t even matter if NET rankings distort tournament seedings. I showed you why this might be a mistaken view. Telling me there’s no difference between #10 seed and a #8 seed is unresponsive. And denying there are any #9 seeds is bizarre and irrelevant. Perhaps you should reread the whole thread and get clear on what you really mean to say, and who you think you’re arguing with. It doesn’t appear to be me. [/QUOTE]