- Joined
- Dec 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,434
- Reaction Score
- 30,099
UConn: 11 (NET). 12 in KenPom. 9 in ESPN BPI. 11 in Massey.
Looks like a down year for the conference. Is that because the Big East is declining compared to power football conferencesor just a relatively down year? Only time will tell.
I was trying to game this out for seeding.Solid 3 seed metrics. With the Big East being real bad this year we should go 15-5 at WORST. Ideally we end up 17-3, win the BET, and get a 2 seed in the East
I actually don't think it's a trend. Georgetown and DePaul are much better than previous years so the floor has risen considerably. Neither has a bad loss. The issue is that Villanova, Seton Hall, and Providence need better coaches. The other issue is that the league lost a ton of one and two possession games. Most of the league wins against P4 opposition were blowouts. Most of the losses were close- see UConn vs. Colorado, Xavier vs. Cincinnati, Seton Hall vs. Rutgers, Villanova vs. Maryland, both of St. John's losses, etc. The league was very unlucky in my opinion. We won 45% of our games against the P4. That's not great, but it's not that bad, and it is much better than the ACC.Looks like a down year for the conference. Is that because the Big East is declining compared to power football conferencesor just a relatively down year? Only time will tell.
Actually, they are going to have less money because they will have to spend a higher percentage on football. Ultimately, I believe the Big East is going to settle into the number 3 hole slightly behind the SEC and Big 10 in basketball and ahead of the Big 12 and ACC.My guess is it’s a trend. Power Conferences and in particular the BiG and SEC will have more money to acquire talent. I think very big dollars are going to come to college basketball talent.
The Big East had a really, really disappointing out of conference season. But the 5th place ACC is much, much closer to the 6th place A Ten than the 4th place Big East.if anyone is curious, canada university south-eastern comes in at 144 with bcu at 190. good times
it seems like over a decade ago when those fans thought the ACC money would create the exact opposite results
It’s 100% a trend. This is a massively micro level view. Look at the first and second team preseason all BE, it’s a bunch of graduates and seniors. What’s coming in behind that to get excited about outside of UConn players?I actually don't think it's a trend. Georgetown and DePaul are much better than previous years so the floor has risen considerably. Neither has a bad loss. The issue is that Villanova, Seton Hall, and Providence need better coaches. The other issue is that the league lost a ton of one and two possession games. Most of the league wins against P4 opposition were blowouts. Most of the losses were close- see UConn vs. Colorado, Xavier vs. Cincinnati, Seton Hall vs. Rutgers, Villanova vs. Maryland, both of St. John's losses, etc. The league was very unlucky in my opinion. We won 45% of our games against the P4. That's not great, but it's not that bad, and it is much better than the ACC.
The Big East has 12 top 100 players committed for the 2025 class already, and that's before the transfer portal happens which is where a lot of these schools have been bringing in their impact guys. Maybe those guys don't get lots of NBA buzz, but they're going to be good college players which is all that matters for how the Big East is perceivedIt’s 100% a trend. This is a massively micro level view. Look at the first and second team preseason all BE, it’s a bunch of graduates and seniors. What’s coming in behind that to get excited about outside of UConn players?
Creighton’s Kalkbrenner Named Preseason Player of the Year
Creighton center Ryan Kalkbrenner has been named 2024-25 BIG EAST Preseason Player of the Year by a vote of the league’s head coaches. Connecticut forward Liam McNeeley has been selected BIG EAST Preseason Freshman of the Year. The coaches, who were not permitted to choose their own players...www.bigeast.com
Follow the money and the big colorful brands - that’s where top kids, TV alluring talent, are going. If the SEC is spiking and investing in hoops, that’s a good sign of what’s to continue. The BE will be reliant on coaches that can coach up second tier talent, and retain it from leaving for P3.
When you’re counting on Gtown and DePaul to steady the ship, that’s cause for concern. These are programs that haven’t produced a compelling team in decades. Cooley has tried, swung at a number of top kids that he’s struck out on. Can’t blame him for trying because talent wins.
Who is the current buzz of the league? Liam McNeeley, future lottery pick freshman leading the top program in the league. Which of these programs in the BE will attract that type of player going forward outside of UConn?
This seems about right. Getting on the top 3 seed lines is important for geographical consideration. What helps is that there are no other worthy teams in the northeast, so as long as we're a 3 or better, we'll definitely get Providence. Getting in the East region is tougher. A #1 seed would have pretty serious complaint if we're their #3 seed in Newark.I was trying to game this out for seeding.
It’ll depend on who we lose the BE games to, but I’ll assume we at least beat Marquette at home and win all our other home games, then take our losses on the road to non-bottom tier teams.
I’d usually make a consideration also of how we do in the BET, but I think it’s safe to say the committee doesn’t put much weight there. So, maybe each of these will move up a seed line by winning it and down a seed line by losing the first game:
15-5 (23-8): 4/5 seed
16-4 (24-7): 3/4 seed
17-3 (25-6): 2/3 seed
18-2 (26-5): 2 seed
Not sure we’re gonna have the SOS clout to get wins to justify a 1 seed barring something insane like 19-1/20-0 in league, which I’ll avoid considering for the sake of rationality (18-2, our BE record last year, is after all the best the conference has ever seen).
But otherwise, it’ll all in front of us to at least get Providence, if not Newark. Getting Newark will come down to where we are on the seed line (i.e., would 9, the first 3 seed, be better than 8, the last 2 seed, because we’d be more likely to be placed into our most geographically advantageous region? Maybe).