Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CTtransplant, post: 2051023, member: 6529"] The small problem with the data, as you present it, is that you are only proving that the difference between the best and the worst is narrowing. You appear to assume that the best have remained the same (or gotten better). It is possible that the narrowing has occurred because the best FT shooting teams are not as good as they used to be. Did you check to see if the FT shooting percentage of the top 25 or 50 teams is the same over the period? It would change your conclusion if it were not so. That said, I really like the way you think, and I appreciate the effort you made to be analytically correct! [/QUOTE]