Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="j66kicker, post: 3532714, member: 4447"] Recommendations in. Now NCAA Board of Governors will vote on it - [U]in 9 months[/U]. The recommendations are more restrictive than the new California law, and were presented as requested: [I]"Ackerman's working group was asked to find a solution that expands NIL rules [U]enough to get state lawmakers to stop moving forward with legislation while also not going so far as to critically weaken their amateurism status in the eyes of the federal court.[/U]"[/I] Recommendations: [LIST] [*]Allow student-athletes to make money by modeling apparel as long as that apparel doesn't include school logos or other "school marks." [*]Allow athletes to make money from advertisements. Athletes would be allowed to identify themselves as college athletes in advertisements, but would not be allowed to reference the school they attend or include any school marks in the advertisement. [*]Prohibit athletes from marketing products that conflict with NCAA legislation, such as gambling operations or banned substances. Individual schools would also be allowed to prohibit athletes from marketing products that do not line up with the school's values. [*]Allow athletes to hire an agent to help procure marketing opportunities, so long as that agent does not seek professional sports opportunities for the client during his or her college career. [*]Require athletes to disclose the details of all endorsement contracts to their athletic department. The working group would recommend further discussion about whether a third party should be involved in overseeing these disclosures in a way that prevents endorsement deals from becoming improper recruiting enticements. [/LIST] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/29109389/source-ncaa-group-propose-possible-changes-allow-athlete-endorsements[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,460

Messages: 4,397,125

Members: 10,210

Latest member: noelle