Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NCAA to soon pass name, image and likeness rules targeting boosters offering inducements to athletes (Dodd)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="auror, post: 4311459, member: 1329"] You're forgetting that NIL is legal and okay. It's not just the fact that he got paid. It's that he got paid EARLY that is the problem. If the NCAA actually tries to enforce this, nobody is advertising their NIL deal on social media before committing. They'll do it 3 days later or whatever. That text is not to the assistant coach. It's to the head of the collective from the player's NIL agent. It's maybe the player's agent asking an assistant coach what collectives or prominent boosters exist at the school. Asking the question about future NIL $ isn't against the rules and won't be. It's like asking about the locker room quality. There are no smoking guns. The school isn't involved in the actual dealing at all, and this is why making the schools not able to participate in the NIL deals makes it an enforcement nightmare. The way I see it, there are two possibilities moving forward without an overhaul of the entire system: 1) The NCAA doesn't try to crack down on anything and all the things happen as you outline and as currently are happening. 2) The NCAA tries to cracks down once and all the dumb people doing obvious violations gets obfuscated behind agents, middlemen, and collectives (if it wasn't already), but everything still happens. There is no 3) Inducements no longer happen. It's all optics. You could probably reduce my argument that attempts to enforce regulations that are unenforceable are bad regulations, and you either need to change the system or get rid of the regulations. Drug laws are ineffective as a deterrent, but very enforceable. We see tons and tons of enforcement. That's not what this is. This is like if USA passed laws about Americans doing drugs while visiting Amsterdam. In your world, the cops can just check out the tourists social media pictures to see if anyone posted about doing drugs. There's no jurisdiction and no enforcement possible because it all happens outside the USA/NCAA legal system. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,511
Messages
4,399,500
Members
10,212
Latest member
MurrDog
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NCAA to soon pass name, image and likeness rules targeting boosters offering inducements to athletes (Dodd)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom