NCAA to increase scholarships for sports, with football getting roster limit of 105 players (Yahoo) | The Boneyard

NCAA to increase scholarships for sports, with football getting roster limit of 105 players (Yahoo)

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
90,163
Reaction Score
342,495


“As part of the new revenue-sharing model — beginning in 2025-26 academic year — by-sport scholarship restrictions are eliminated, and schools are permitted to offer scholarships to the entirety of their rosters. The new roster limit figures are not final until the approval of House settlement terms.”
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,083
Reaction Score
2,070
That's all well and good but title ix will still apply to those
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
929
Reaction Score
2,081
Hopefully sports like baseball & hockey at UConn can keep up.
Baseball adding 22 schollies is crazy.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,276
Reaction Score
11,034
You think the portal is crowded now……

Wait until the SEC and BiG load up on top recruits and then shed what they don’t want.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,083
Reaction Score
2,070
You think the portal is crowded now……

Wait until the SEC and BiG load up on top recruits and then shed what they don’t want.
That's already true with NIL
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,047
Reaction Score
5,426
55 people will now be on full scholarship for a sport called tumbling. In other news I just found out that there is a sport called tumbling.
No they won't, it's the maximum amount, not a mandatory allotment
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,083
Reaction Score
2,070
No they won't, it's the maximum amount, not a mandatory allotment
It's a slough category to have a sport to allow for men's sports to have more schollies. You should recall some of the equestrian scandals due to poor treatment of horses as schools needed to have more women's schollies to satisfy title ix
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2017
Messages
181
Reaction Score
949
This is moronic. It just further fuels the fundraising arms race that every school finds itself in as the brave new world of NIL/portal takes shape. Now the tin cups will be rattling louder given that 105 scholarships will have to be paid for.

I wonder if any of these new "extra" schollies will be bestowed on the sons of big donors in exchange for a sixth position slot on the QB depth chart? Next I wonder if this was the whole point.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
2,185
Reaction Score
8,939
No they won't, it's the maximum amount, not a mandatory allotment
I get that. It’s just odd to me that they are stashing all of these potential Title 9 Mandates under something as unknown as tumbling. Just tack a few more to the backend of sports that schools actually sponsor.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,083
Reaction Score
2,070
This is moronic. It just further fuels the fundraising arms race that every school finds itself in as the brave new world of NIL/portal takes shape. Now the tin cups will be rattling louder given that 105 scholarships will have to be paid for.

I wonder if any of these new "extra" schollies will be bestowed on the sons of big donors in exchange for a sixth position slot on the QB depth chart? Next I wonder if this was the whole point.
its a race to the breaking point at this rate. pure ridiculousness
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,194
Reaction Score
86,619
With all these new schollies. I'm sure there will be an increase in administration as well.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
90,163
Reaction Score
342,495
With all these new schollies. I'm sure there will be an increase in administration as well.
… or a decrease in the number of sports sponsored by schools/conferenceS:

 
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
123
Reaction Score
273
Years ago there were no scholarship limits. The big/ wealthy programs were stockpiling players just to keep other schools from getting them. At 1 time i think it was Nebraska that had 150 in their program. In order to spread out the talent, limits were set at 115, then 105, then 95, then 85. JV + Freshman teams were eliminated. However transfer rules were not as easy as they are today. What will be the overall effect of competitiveness of the game ? Only time will tell. Will the P-Conf. gobble up guys that might normally go to a G5 or UConn ?
 

UCFBfan

Semi Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
5,901
Reaction Score
11,920
At least there's NCAA 25 where I can relive the glory days of pre conference realignment and reset the conferences!! Lol!
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,083
Reaction Score
2,070
Years ago there were no scholarship limits. The big/ wealthy programs were stockpiling players just to keep other schools from getting them. At 1 time i think it was Nebraska that had 150 in their program. In order to spread out the talent, limits were set at 115, then 105, then 95, then 85. JV + Freshman teams were eliminated. However transfer rules were not as easy as they are today. What will be the overall effect of competitiveness of the game ? Only time will tell. Will the P-Conf. gobble up guys that might normally go to a G5 or UConn ?
reality is we're back to an era where stockpiling can occur, the only thing really stopping it is the desire to play and the ability to free transfer. Something will bend in that regard. I think the purpose of "depth scholarships" at this point is about having the best practice squad possible. These operations are becoming more like war machines than football teams.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,361
Reaction Score
5,263
At least there's NCAA 25 where I can relive the glory days of pre conference realignment and reset the conferences!! Lol!
I definitely undid quite a few moves and made a few other tweaks to get back to some combination of conference alignments that made sense.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
1,612
Reaction Score
7,473
You think the portal is crowded now……

Wait until the SEC and BiG load up on top recruits and then shed what they don’t want.
This. If anybody thought this helps kids forget it. It’s all about stockpiling and creating more separation between schools with huge revenue share and have-nots.
 

Online statistics

Members online
364
Guests online
2,479
Total visitors
2,843

Forum statistics

Threads
158,434
Messages
4,151,056
Members
10,033
Latest member
Scorpio1


.
Top Bottom