NCAA lost the Alston Case | The Boneyard

NCAA lost the Alston Case

Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
154
Reaction Score
246
A federal judge ruled Friday night that the NCAA cannot “limit compensation or benefits related to education” for athletes playing Division I men’s or women’s basketball or Bowl Subdivision football.
Among the items U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken said these athletes may receive are scholarships to complete undergraduate or graduate degrees at any school.
At the same time, however, her ruling prevents athletes from receiving unlimited benefits, as the plaintiffs had hoped.
The NCAA "may continue ... to limit compensation and benefits that are unrelated to education," Wilken ruled. The association also can limit "academic or graduation awards of incentives, provided in cash or cash-equivalent."
She also said that the association may adopt a definition of compensation and benefits that are “related to education.”
The outcome represents a partial victory for plaintiffs who were seeking to have the association’s limits on athletes compensation in favor of allowing conferences to determine what athletes can receive
Judge ends NCAA cap on athlete compensation 'related to education,' leaves other limits intact
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,942
Reaction Score
208,668
Really have some difficulty following the logic. Limiting academic benefits is a restraint of trade but limiting other benefits is not? What is the distinction once you decide that college athletics is a business?
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,504
Reaction Score
8,011
I reckon it is still a nod to the premise that college scholarship athletes are students not employees.

Universities can not be constrained by an entity like the NCAA on the value of educational benefits offered.....but may limit other than educational benefits....
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
762
Reaction Score
695
"Among the items U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken said these athletes may receive are scholarships to complete undergraduate or graduate degrees at any school. The judge also appeared to open the possibility of athletes being able to receive cash or cash-equivalent awards based on academics or graduation, albeit under some constraints.

At the same time, however, her 104-page ruling prevents athletes from receiving unlimited benefits, as the plaintiffs had hoped.

The NCAA "may continue ... to limit compensation and benefits that are unrelated to education," Wilken ruled.


She also said that the association may adopt a definition of compensation and benefits that are “related to education.”

The association can limit "academic or graduation awards of incentives, provided in cash or cash-equivalent" but that limit cannot be "less than the maximum amount of compensation that an individual could receive in an academic school year in participation, championship, or other special achievement awards (combined)."


It seems a limited ruling and a less than complete victory for the plaintiffs. Nothing Earth shattering.

It seems to mean/will cause much less than the all encompassing changes the plaintiffs wanted and some predicted.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,504
Reaction Score
8,011
Every SEC school will soon launch the high demand Major "Comparative Auto Mechanics". Class options include:
1) Escalade vs Navigator: You Decide
2) Is paying for an AMG really worth it?
3) The History of the Rolls Royce

And of course, your choice of car is required as a learning aid...

No real difference from current practice except tieing the car into a course.

Alabama Football Is The Best Car Dealership In The Country
 

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
3,380
Total visitors
3,561

Forum statistics

Threads
156,974
Messages
4,074,993
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom