Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MooseJaw, post: 3950743, member: 10835"] For a one time deal, one year call it what you want but for one year ok. More than one year I call it a potential disaster. There are many reasons why unrestricted no consequence transfers are bad for the athletes and the schools. Do we want the schools to honor their offers and scholarships to the athletes for the full 4-5 years while allowing the student to fly over any and all whims at any time. There comes a time when for various reasons, case in point EW where the relationship is so fractured and beyond repair that the only logical action is to transfer. Other cases can be made for transfers, with few that I believe deserve not sitting out for a year. A player does their homework compares schools and makes what should be an informed decision and signs what is a contract mutually beneficially to student and school. In order to keep players and schools from chasing titles while having a revolving door policy the one year restriction is necessary and I support it as long as it is administered fairly and without prejudices. Allowing unrestricted no consequence transfers imo will result in a diminished product that most of us will not want to be part of. I know that there are opposing views I welcome them, we and WCBB needs to discuss and debate what is in the best interest of the student, the schools and fans. Lets hope they get it right. [/QUOTE]