Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NCAA: Committee on Infractions could not conclude UNC violated NCAA rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="crewbear742, post: 2373479, member: 7435"] To declare the classes fradulent, the NCAA would have had to find the the course content fradulent. There was nothing else fradulent about them. To declare the course content fradulent, the NCAA would have had to exert jurisdiction over course content. This the NCAA will not do. That's why the NCAA refused to press the case on the basis of academic fraud. University professors are jealous of their exclusive right to judge academic content. Without any basis to charge academic fraud, the NCAA had no remaining viable grounds for punishment. That is all this case amounts to. So the NCAA dropped it rather than have its head removed by the Court. If you think I am wrong, then explain the conclusion of the case without appealing to a dark conspiracy. A conspiracy charge is made by those who refuse to accept the outcome but have no contrary evidence. It's a convenient vehicle to reach a pre-determined conclusion. Instead explain how the NCAA could have charged the case without judging course content given the fact that the courses were technically legitimate in every other way. The NCAA couldn't answer this question. Perhaps you are able to do so - without making irrelevant appeals to APR. There is no conspiracy here. FOIA won't produce any evidence of conspiracy. If the NCAA had wanted to bury this case quietly, it had ample opportunity over the last six years. Could you in fact have planned a worse public presentation for a conspiracy than what happened? If UNC had the power to kill its punishment at this late date, don't you think it would have exercised that power a little sooner? Don't you think the NCAA would have been a little more clever? It didn't have to wait until the very last moment to back off, thus making itself look as bad as possible. You don't hide a body by carrying it into the middle of Yankee Stadium and digging up the pitcher's mound during a game. There is nothing more to this than UNC slithering through a crack in the rules. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
NCAA: Committee on Infractions could not conclude UNC violated NCAA rules
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom