Ncaa changes

[husky99]

 

[Kitaman]

Some of us are old and can't listen to 30+ minutes of talk to find the nugget of information on what will change.

So can someone do a favor for the TLDR generation.

 

[husky99]

Some of us are old and can't listen to 30+ minutes of talk to find the nugget of information on what will change.

So can someone do a favor for the TLDR generation.

1st 5 minutes...

 

[Chin Diesel]

1st 5 minutes...

The NCAA is changing the first 5 minutes of what???

 

[auror]

I am not so sure that the April 6th date is that much of a formality, especially in regards to the Collective NIL oversight. That was the section of the agreement that the judge had the biggest problem with.

 

[Ewekon]

Here's a kick in the sack O nuts. Only UConn has 4 sports that will have kids wanting to be big time and make rev share $. So if it's $20MM per school, that feeds 1 team or maybe 75% to 1, being men's BB, across the BEast.

We have 2 BB programs, football with visions of grandeur and a bit of hockey.

Somehow, the NCAA screws UConn ... Again....still.

 

[Devland]

How long before there is a title IX type lawsuit and NIL has to be split evenly between men and women's sports?

 

[CTFAN4LIFE]

How long before there is a title IX type lawsuit and NIL has to be split evenly between men and women's sports?

There's that angle, as well as possible other class action suits, plus the issue of the House settlement capping pay without players having employee status. Seems like a quagmire of lawsuits still awaits.

 

[Hurleyman216]

Here's a kick in the sack O nuts. Only UConn has 4 sports that will have kids wanting to be big time and make rev share $. So if it's $20MM per school, that feeds 1 team or maybe 75% to 1, being men's BB, across the BEast.

We have 2 BB programs, football with visions of grandeur and a bit of hockey.

Somehow, the NCAA screws UConn ... Again....still.

Yes, but the SEC/Big 10/Big 12 all have the same issue, so I expect the lawsuits they discuss here will actually help us out.

 

[Ewekon]

Yes, but the SEC/Big 10/Big 12 all have the same issue, so I expect the lawsuits they discuss here will actually help us out.

Yeah, Thought about that. But those 3 all share the same situation..only Huskies in our conference.

 

[bendm]

Here's a kick in the sack O nuts. Only UConn has 4 sports that will have kids wanting to be big time and make rev share $. So if it's $20MM per school, that feeds 1 team or maybe 75% to 1, being men's BB, across the BEast.

We have 2 BB programs, football with visions of grandeur and a bit of hockey.

Somehow, the NCAA screws UConn ... Again....still.

75-85% of revenue will go to p4 football programs which we dont have the last time I checked. Thats why this is supposedly going to benefit BE bball. But schools are free to spend whatever percentage they want on whichever sports they want. SJU and Nova will have an advantage since they don’t have a football program on life support. And Duke and UK and KU will prob be closer to 60-40 in favor of football.

 

[husky99]

The NCAA is changing the first 5 minutes of what???

Of the pod cast.... it was asked when in the 30 minute podcast was the ncaa changes talked about. I said the 1st five minutes

 

[Stinger92860]

Some of us are old and can't listen to 30+ minutes of talk to find the nugget of information on what will change.

So can someone do a favor for the TLDR generation.

Or get/create a transcript, add to a AI LLM, and ask for transcript notes. You’re welcome! I think I am part of your gen, possible older.

 

[Kitaman]

Or get/create a transcript, add to a AI LLM, and ask for transcript notes. You’re welcome! I think I am part of your gen, possible older.

This sounds like work.

 

[Kitaman]

Of the pod cast.... it was asked when in the 30 minute podcast was the ncaa changes talked about. I said the 1st five minutes

Way back you weren't so serious before you had kids.

 

[runner11]

I would not trust any content from Zannetto.

 

[husky99]

Way back you weren't so serious before you had kids.

Hahaha then I got remarried and now have 6... this is truth
@Kitaman

 

[husky99]

I would not trust any content from Zannetto.

Understandable. Tough to create that much daily content... but this is about ncaa changes and not recruiting or portals gossip.

 

[UConnJim]

How long before there is a title IX type lawsuit and NIL has to be split evenly between men and women's sports?

Revenue sharing is the only possible issue up for a lawsuit, but I don't think they will win as it's pretty easy to tie revenues to each sport. If the football program is bringing in 75% of the revenues, then the players deserve to be paid more. Just like a concert. The higher the concert revenues, the more, in general, the performers are paid. Title IX is about equal opportunities and not equal outcomes.

NIL is a different animal all together. When a company is using an individual athlete's name or image, the athlete gets paid individually. For example, if Paige Bueckers is getting paid by Gatorade to endorse their product, she is who Gatorade has contracted to help sell their product, not the University of Connecticut.

 

[AZHuskiePop]

Here's a kick in the sack O nuts. Only UConn has 4 sports that will have kids wanting to be big time and make rev share $. So if it's $20MM per school, that feeds 1 team or maybe 75% to 1, being men's BB, across the BEast.

We have 2 BB programs, football with visions of grandeur and a bit of hockey.

Somehow, the NCAA screws UConn ... Again....still.

 

[Kitaman]

Revenue sharing is the only possible issue up for a lawsuit, but I don't think they will win as it's pretty easy to tie revenues to each sport. If the football program is bringing in 75% of the revenues, then the players deserve to be paid more. Just like a concert. The higher the concert revenues, the more, in general, the performers are paid. Title IX is about equal opportunities and not equal outcomes.

NIL is a different animal all together. When a company is using an individual athlete's name or image, the athlete gets paid individually. For example, if Paige Bueckers is getting paid by Gatorade to endorse their product, she is who Gatorade has contracted to help sell their product, not the University of Connecticut.

Has it been established who 'owns' the athlete (school or athlete)? I thought I recall seeing commercials with uniforms.

If the uniforms are worn are there any implications/benefit for the university?

 

[UCLJ0211]

There's that angle, as well as possible other class action suits, plus the issue of the House settlement capping pay without players having employee status. Seems like a quagmire of lawsuits still awaits.