- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 9,037
- Reaction Score
- 39,091
Who wants to bet that they implement changes prior to the 2013-2014 season where a hell of a lot more teams will be affected?
I am thinking this is really likely. If there were 13 teams this year I am sure there will be a similar number next year and 2013-2014. The more fanbases that this affects the more fans and the media will educate themselves on the injustices and flaws of this system and just as this is a PR move to give the aPR a face it will be a PR move for the NCAA to save face in a year or so.
If so then all they need is an injunction. Then you wait for the pressure to mount and the NCAA to change the rule/calculation and all the pieces fall into place. Almost seems too simple........
Isn't Syracuse not eligible under the current rules for the tournament a couple years from now? Who wants to bet that they change the rules once again so they are included?
That statement seems completely wrong. An APR isn't a calculation that is relative to other schools that requires a lag time. It's just a straight measure of your own academic progress.
Since Emmert is going after us personally, we need to respond in kind. Whatever action we bring against the NCAA needs to be brought against Emmert personally as well.