Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SubbaBub, post: 4642891, member: 523"]
Seeding is still just other people's subjective opinions, even if those people are given the title of "committee".  Every year there are a handful of "top" teams however you define that.  All this says is that the chattering class was wrong...again.  Running though the bottom halves of 16 team leagues will put up gaudy records.   There hasn't been a single NCAA champion that hasn't beat at least one of the "really good teams" to get there.    People whine about playing Ga Tech, Butler, #8 Kentucky, and SDSU in the finals but fail to talk about beating Duke, Kentucky, Florida, and Gonzaga to get there.

The 2023 destroyed the early non-conference, including Alabama,  Gonzaga was another top team, destroyed them too.  Kansas couldn't make the game, why does anyone think they were more likely to beat this team than Purdue.  I don't hear anyone whining about us missing Purdue.   It's all sour grapes.  Every team in the field had it's chance to meet UConn in the final if not before and failed.  boo hoo.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach