Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="LwrcasefaN, post: 4671653, member: 11185"] I think if you apply the logic that the size of the impacted object isn't the sole variable in play, then it shouldn't be that hard. There's force applied to the object as well as the balance of that object. I like this rule change. I hope they expand on it. IMO, too may defenders, who are in [U]legal guarding position[/U], but [I][U]retreating[/U][/I] (not set) get called for blocks because the offensive players just bull dozes into them. Flops became more popular because defenders weren't getting these calls. They started "selling" or "exaggerating" their position. Summing up my mini rant....legal guarding position does not necessarily mean set...although many refs call it that way. [/QUOTE]