Massey; UConn, Stanford, Baylor, Maryland, SC. It may change tomorrowPoor showing. Baylor or even Maryland was more deserving.
So what did you decide on for your meal?
So what did you decide on for your meal?
Excellent!!20 ounce Ribeye, medium rare. Mashed potatoes with butter sour cream and cheddar cheese... caesar salad.
Poor showing. Baylor or even Maryland was more deserving.
Dessert?20 ounce Ribeye, medium rare. Mashed potatoes with butter sour cream and cheddar cheese... caesar salad.
Dessert?
Can I recommend a good Statin with your meal?20 ounce Ribeye, medium rare. Mashed potatoes with butter sour cream and cheddar cheese... caesar salad.
Dessert?
Can I recommend a good Statin with your meal?
Well, A&M is also volunteering for this thread, and Baylor didn't look overwhelming today.
NC State beat South Carolina, and Louisville twice. Thems the facts.
TEAPoor showing. Baylor or even Maryland was more deserving.
So it appears the anticipated difficult bracket did not play itself out with Uconn never having to face A&M nor Tenn, or Kentucky- the teams that were supposed to have made this the toughest bracket. Of course they still have to face Baylor.If UCONN beats Baylor to advance to the final four, they play the winner of Arizona/ Indiana. A much easier path to the finals than the other side of the bracket with Louisville, South Carolina, Maryland, & Stanford fighting it out.
I definitely see your point. You can’t just go off potential and neither squad mentioned had the quantitative backing on paper, even if they passed the eye test.The selection committee thoroughly examines each team's whole season & their seedings reflected that. By the start of the tournament, Baylor & Maryland were two of the best teams in the country. But their whole body of work wasn't enough for the committee to have them leapfrog over Texas AM & NC State.
I actually agreed with your premise that NCState & Texas A&M should have been seeded lower than Baylor & Maryland. But the selection committee's formula is credible.I made a (now deleted, thanks admins!) post to the contrary, but I definitely see your point. You can’t just go off potential and neither squad mentioned had the quantitative backing on paper, even if they passed the eye test.
At the end of the day, this kind of parity is good for the game.