Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HuskyHawk, post: 2730174, member: 1414"] Very Fair. I would start Kyrie over Curry. I think he does a lot more. Curry would be an undersized shooting guard on a team that didn't have Draymond Green taking most of the PG assist duties. I think on most teams it wouldn't even be close. I'll say it another way, Curry couldn't start over Kyrie for Boston (they'd probably play him at the 2 over Brown or Smart though). But that's a great example of why I think GS is more than the sum of its parts. I think Boston is too. Both teams are constructed intelligently to maximize the value of their players. Could a Celtic start over Draymond Green for GS? No. But I'm not sure Green could start over Tatum/Hayward for a fully healthy Boston, given what they need at that spot. GS doesn't need the scoring there and Boston does. I really hope they get to the finals together, because they are really good "teams", not just collections of players. Philly right now is a collection of players. They are worse than their talent as a result. [/QUOTE]