Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MadDogRevival, post: 2231313, member: 8028"] There's a massive difference. One's ability to see it appears to be inversely related to how much one dislikes LeBron. Durant went to the best team in the league, that was already the best team without him, and that already had set a regular season win record - without him. They would have been in the finals - without him. They probably would have won - without him. He could have sucked big nuts and they probably win - without him. Yeah yeah, he had big stats in the finals, but so what? If he's not taking the shot, then Curry or Thompson or Green eat up those shots. The "take" is prevalent because there's an overriding feeling that he wasn't needed by the Warriors, who didn't need him, and he went there not to make a difference, because they didn't need him for that, but rather to put on a ring. He, quite literally, could have blown out both ACLs in December, not played another game, and still gotten a ring (assuming they give them out to injured players). That was not the case either time for LeBron, AT ALL, and if you can't see that, it's because you don't want to see that. [/QUOTE]