Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Pro Sports (MLB, NFL, NBA, etc)
NBA Finals Thread - Celtics vs Mavericks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Matrim55, post: 5024274, member: 3376"] Really interesting Reddit post on Tatum I'm going to paste here: [URL='https://www.reddit.com/r/nbadiscussion/comments/1dcmuj3/if_the_celtics_won_this_title_in_the_80s_tatum/']If the Celtics won this title in the 80’s, Tatum would be viewed like Isiah Thomas was then[/URL] This demonstrates how obsessed people are, for better and worse, with individual star stat-lines now. Isiah Thomas, to win his maiden title: [LIST] [*]18/4/8, 3 turnovers on 41/27/74, serviceable defence (though he was never a stopper). [*]21/5/8 on 39/16/74 against the Bulls. [*]21/2/7 on 49/33/76 against the Lakers. [/LIST] ^ even with “stat inflation” factored in, these are very modest numbers. And not a single person on earth gave a ****. Plays better the following year, but put up a pedestrian 17/6/8 on 39% in a narrow 7 game win against the Bulls. Yet despite this, and despite having one of the most stacked rotations of all time (the Pistons compare quite nicely to the Celtics, relative to era), few people were saying things like “Thomas was carried!” (to an extent, on paper at least he was) and “STACKED TEAM” (it was). However much like Tatum he was the heart of the team, a great chemistry guy, and was one of the most durable players in the league during that part of his career (meaning, he always put himself in contention). He also didn’t seem to care one iota about his individual stats. Nor did anyone else on that team. Did it lead to him getting [I]some[/I] excessive credit? Probably. But such was the landscape of the league in a time where people actually cared about how teams did, rather than individual players. Much preferable to the **** we see today. Pick your poison, I s’pose. Edit: I’m only assuming for the sake of the argument that the Celtics win. I realize the series isn’t over, but the discourse surrounding Tatum won’t change much regardless. ------------------ I actually think that's a really good comparison. Like Tatum Isiah was a fringe top 5 guy in the league whose team was deeper and had a unique game model (the transition from the go-go '80s to the grit-n-grind mid-90s really started with the Bad Boys). [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic Boards
Pro Sports (MLB, NFL, NBA, etc)
NBA Finals Thread - Celtics vs Mavericks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom