Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Roger G, post: 2505488, member: 7083"] Whether I agree with it or not, I am impressed by the work you put in to make that list. But I still don't get the idea that on the one hand all the Atlantic 10 supposedly stinks, but Michigan was going to be really stupid and not pay special attention to the girl who previously played (pretty decently) at UConn and was the Big East freshman of the year. I mean, it was pretty obvious to any observer that Natalie was going to be the biggest contributor on her team. I also don't agree with the idea, as I've stated again and again, that last year's WNBA draft was particularly weak, but we'll wait to see if your test pans out and half of the 1st round picks don't stick. Remember that the great and dominating Saniya Chong was picked in the third round. Another thing, if Natalie's best game was against Houston, an AAC team, that is kind of peculiar. Since the Atlantic 10 is chopped liver, you would think that she would have her best games against teams from her own conference. It's got to make you wonder whether, if given the chance in the AAC, she would be putting up similar or perhaps better numbers. In the end, it won't be my opinion or yours that matters. The GM's and coaches will decide. And the rest of the season will mean a lot. [/QUOTE]