napier might be out for pitt game | The Boneyard

napier might be out for pitt game

Status
Not open for further replies.

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,289
Reaction Score
22,844
probably was pile driven into the ground on one of them there "no calls"
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
172
Reaction Score
380
Well, the article appears to say he's a go, and that's good. Very good. Good like when your wife brings home a snickers blizzard from Dairy Queen and you weren't expecting it.

There would be one upside to him being out tomorrow however. And that would be that, after getting completely obliterated at the Petersen Events Center, every witness to the slaughter would have all doubt removed as to how very good, and how very critical to our success, Shabazz Napier is.
 

patrick

Hurley4#6
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
1,304
Reaction Score
1,673
Another upside if he is out is that we have more then a week off till our next game against Rutgers. Should be plenty of time to get better. That being said I think he will play tomorrow Shabazz is a GAMER!!!!

LOVE KO'S LINE "NEXT MAN UP!"
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,537
Reaction Score
222,761
Another upside if he is out is that we have more then a week off till our next game against Rutgers. Should be plenty of time to get better. That being said I think he will play tomorrow Shabazz is a GAMER!!!!

LOVE KO'S LINE "NEXT MAN UP!"
“We have a motto around here: Next man up,” said Ollie. “If he’s not feeling well, not able to play to the level that we think he needs to play at, then R.J.’s got to play a bigger role, Brendan’s got to be ready to come off (the bench). We’ll find a way, like we’ve been doing the whole season.”
Interesting that he didn't mention Omar.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,256
Reaction Score
133,326
Interesting that he didn't mention Omar.

Only up until the second you realize that he's referring to his fellow point guards.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,271
Reaction Score
43,448
Huge SN fan but there are legitimate limitations to his superman abilities. The injury was severe and not of the hangnail variety. His self criticism of his poor play following that injury are self defeating imo. I would criticize him only if he chose to make light of the injury keeping out a qualified person from entering the game. But there wasn't. As ineffectual as SN was following the injury, he still was probably more effectual than all but one other UConn player on that court. He was just ineffectual relative to his normal healthy self.

He took this similar approach to last years injury - the broken foot. And it had the negative effect of causing the uninformed or the jaded fan of foisting unnecessary criticism on SN which only changed after everyone realized the problem with last years team wasn't SN.

We have the idea we shouldn't make excuses for our limitations. I think this is bs. SN should be the last person down on himself for how the game changed after the injury. I think we are so jaded by people making excuses for their miserable lives or performances we sometimes go to the other extreme.

SN, you kept UConn in the game when healthy. I will go on the limb and say you most likely would have kept UConn in the entire game if you had not been hurt. I know I'm only preaching to a bunch of lost souls, but if this can some how reach you, I hope you don't get down on yourself every time you get hurt.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,377
Reaction Score
13,979
Well if SN is hindered UConn would be forced to play a bigger lineup. I can't imagine Evans starting.

I guess it would be Boat, Calhoun, Giffey, Daniels, Olander?

Pitt has a lineup with decent height. They have been playing a lot of guys with 10 guys playing in most games and all playing over 12 minutes.

PG - Woodall (6')
SG - Robinson (6'3), Zeigler 6'5), Wright (6'4)
SF - Patterson (6'5), Moore (6'6)
PF - Zanna (6'9), Johnson (6'6)
C - Adams (7'0), Taylor (6'9)

Woodall is a pretty good PG, not outstanding but solid. Not nearly as good or quick as the UL guards.

Robinson is a decent freshman and plays the second PG position for Pitt. He's a solid PG, but not great offensively.

Patterson is pretty physical and typical Pitt thug player.

Adams/Zanna are like a poor man's version of Dieng/Behannan.

Taylor has been a bust, but he is big.
Moore and Johnson are pretty athletic for Pitt players as is Zeigler.

Solid defensive team, has trouble with quick guards is pretty much Pitt. They may play some zone, but won't likely press a ton. They have a well rounded scoring bunch, but nobody you really worry about going off for 20+ on most nights.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
10,040
Reaction Score
33,923
This should be a good game. Hopefully Napier is ready to go.
 

Horatio

15 years no Madden
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
3,371
Reaction Score
12,802
I hope Shabazz plays but if he doesn't I'd like to see Brendan Allen get some minutes and do well.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
546
Reaction Score
635
As much as I would like to see Brendan Allen, this game may very well be right up R.J. Evans' alley. I'd imagine it will be very physical and to what my friends refer to Big East basketball as "Jail Ball". Evans will be able to charge the lane and just throw the ball at the backboard as he often does and nobody will notice.

Shabazz please be OK!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,382
Reaction Score
23,714
Huge SN fan but there are legitimate limitations to his superman abilities. The injury was severe and not of the hangnail variety. His self criticism of his poor play following that injury are self defeating imo. I would criticize him only if he chose to make light of the injury keeping out a qualified person from entering the game. But there wasn't. As ineffectual as SN was following the injury, he still was probably more effectual than all but one other UConn player on that court. He was just ineffectual relative to his normal healthy self.

He took this similar approach to last years injury - the broken foot. And it had the negative effect of causing the uninformed or the jaded fan of foisting unnecessary criticism on SN which only changed after everyone realized the problem with last years team wasn't SN.

We have the idea we shouldn't make excuses for our limitations. I think this is bs. SN should be the last person down on himself for how the game changed after the injury. I think we are so jaded by people making excuses for their miserable lives or performances we sometimes go to the other extreme.

SN, you kept UConn in the game when healthy. I will go on the limb and say you most likely would have kept UConn in the entire game if you had not been hurt. I know I'm only preaching to a bunch of lost souls, but if this can some how reach you, I hope you don't get down on yourself every time you get hurt.

Maybe I'm mis-interpreting what you're trying to say, but I disagree with your take here. If Shabazz isn't kicking himself with the way he played the other night, he's not a competitor. He didn't take the Rasheed Wallace "both teams played hard" approach. He was thoroughly disappointed with his play. This type of dedication and self-critique is something you see in every great athlete when their team loses, regardless of how much the odds were stacked against them. Accountability is something Ollie has been preaching, and although Shabazz was one of the more level-headed players on the team coming in to college, it's clear that Ollie has had a positive influence on him.

Don't get me wrong - Shabazz's self-examination is obviously harsh. The fans are as happy with the way this team has performed this season given the roster restraints as they have been with any UConn team in recent memory. These kids play their asses off, and nobody plays harder than Shabazz. He plays 35-40 minutes per game, through injury, all the while having to burden the massive responsibility of leadership. He's a true warrior, and when he has an off day like he did Monday, he's naturally going to be pi**ed off and disappointed. That's what separates those who take the elevator from those who take the stairs.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,271
Reaction Score
43,448
Maybe I'm mis-interpreting what you're trying to say, but I disagree with your take here. If Shabazz isn't kicking himself with the way he played the other night, he's not a competitor. He didn't take the Rasheed Wallace "both teams played hard" approach. He was thoroughly disappointed with his play. This type of dedication and self-critique is something you see in every great athlete when their team loses, regardless of how much the odds were stacked against them. Accountability is something Ollie has been preaching, and although Shabazz was one of the more level-headed players on the team coming in to college, it's clear that Ollie has had a positive influence on him.

Don't get me wrong - Shabazz's self-examination is obviously harsh. The fans are as happy with the way this team has performed this season given the roster restraints as they have been with any UConn team in recent memory. These kids play their asses off, and nobody plays harder than Shabazz. He plays 35-40 minutes per game, through injury, all the while having to burden the massive responsibility of leadership. He's a true warrior, and when he has an off day like he did Monday, he's naturally going to be pi**ed off and disappointed. That's what separates those who take the elevator from those who take the stairs.
It's a fine line between realistic expectations and unrealistic expectations. And that line differs for each and every one of us and for each and every situation. And it is a fine line between motivation and non motivation. The problem is we can't measure this quantitatively. I'm all for ten toes in. But injuries limit players. I don't see anyone who is limited by an injury making excuses for himself if the injury is legitimate. And both of SN injuries, last year with the broken foot, and the last two games with the shoulder contusion, were limiting injuries to SN's performance. Should he be bummed out that circumstances limited his play. Absolutely!! But why take it out on himself. SN played through those injuries. He should be proud of himself that he gutted things out, not down on himself that he couldn't play up to his standards. That isn't ten toes in. That's someone who thinks he's superman when he's not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
392
Guests online
2,702
Total visitors
3,094

Forum statistics

Threads
160,118
Messages
4,218,917
Members
10,083
Latest member
unlikejo


.
Top Bottom