Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuango, post: 4777818, member: 3834"] MSSportsGuy is right! This is basically a farce! (My word) This list should be 10 or, at the most, 20! 50 turns it into a joke! There are at least 35-40 names on here who have 0 chance of winning this award! On the other hand, suddenly I feel overwhelmed with guilt! Who am I to say who’s capable of being the [B]best [/B]player? Why not just say anyone who plays women’s basketball? That would require a little more typing but then everyone could have their name on a list. It seems so unfair to leave anyone off. In fact, I’m starting to feel uneasy about [B]all [/B]these lists! Aren’t we just [B]othering[/B] all the people who probably would love to be on those lists? However, it also occurs to me that perhaps [B]no one[/B] should be on a list. I mean, were these people even consulted? Maybe they are uncomfortable about being singled out like this. It’s all so confusing! Perhaps they could give everyone a Naismith trophy?:rolleyes: Seriously though, I think putting this many players, most of whom will not even sniff this trophy, cheapens the process and lessens the honor of being chosen as a legitimate contender for the award! [/QUOTE]