Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 3960884, member: 7492"] Ok, let's actually look at the whole dialogue so you can follow 1+1+1=3 1. Your esteemed Gamecock colleague posted on #203 page 9 [I]"Mulkey and Muffett were the only two major coaches [B]who didn't seem to want[/B] to schedule Dawn so looks like we got all the bases covered now."[/I] 2. Your esteemed Gamecock colleague then posted #216 page 9 [I]"I just said that they were the only two powers that didn't schedule Dawn in non-conference. I didn't mean to insinuate they were scared, just apparently uninterested."[/I] Where he incorrectly omitted his word "WANT" The inference is all Major coaches should "want" to schedule SC and or should be "interested" in scheduling SC. 3. This prompted me to say in #225 [I]"Duly noted, but so what? ND played and plays a pretty good OOC, Kim seems a tad light but has played UConn sporadically over the years. Is Dawn all of a sudden a squad teams need to aspire to play?"[/I] And I stand by that assertion, there is NO FALSE component. Also note how "pithy of a response mine is vs. your complete and utter rambling of mis-facts and tangential thought. There was no discussion on Dawn wanting to play anyone... I know now with Cardoso to SC, the collective Gamecock fandom wants the rest of the WCBB universe to "All hail to Dawn" as the mighty Queen that all need to aspire but color me skeptical until she actually wins a few more titles ON THE COURT to EARN that mantra and the logic that all team should [B]want [/B]and be [B]interested[/B] in scheduling SC. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,474

Messages: 4,397,594

Members: 10,210

Latest member: MurrDog