Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="August_West, post: 2043187, member: 1047"] Yup. You can really categorize this board by age from the replies. For those of us old enough to be engaged since, at minimum, the entire Calhoun era there is simply no other response. 90 was the worst. 94 (sweet 16 with Carolina out of our path because BC), 96 (loaded) , and 2006 (FGM) all hurt. Bad. 95 and 2002 we were simply beat by a team as good as, or better than us. No different than 98. Just closer games. But we were a finger tip deflection and a double pump jumper in OT from the FF in 90. Elation to dejection in a Blur. Totally a gut punch. More like a kick in the nads. The youngsters here are lucky to not have lived through that game. [/QUOTE]