More motivation

[McLovin]

@Abe1 show this to your players.

The 349 teams that won't win the 2021 men's national championship

There are 357 Division I men's basketball teams. And most won't have much of a chance to win it all. We break down the near misses.

www.espn.com

We are number 51 under "no clear path".

 

[rayrayfor3]

I love how he said its always worked then said only since 2016. Since 2016 the winners have been three 1 seeds and one 2 seed. Wow really going out on a limb!

 

[Abe1]

@Abe1 show this to your players.

The 349 teams that won't win the 2021 men's national championship

There are 357 Division I men's basketball teams. And most won't have much of a chance to win it all. We break down the near misses.

www.espn.com

We are number 51 under "no clear path".

Lol....ok

 

[Rico444]

@Abe1 show this to your players.

The 349 teams that won't win the 2021 men's national championship

There are 357 Division I men's basketball teams. And most won't have much of a chance to win it all. We break down the near misses.

www.espn.com

We are number 51 under "no clear path".

He's not Dan Hurley, he's James Bouknight. Get it right

 

[Get a Job]

He's not Dan Hurley, he's James Bouknight. Get it right

I thought he was James Doran ?‍♂️

 

[Umami Zen]

Bouk is talkin' about kill or be killed.. Seems self-motivated without any additional need for fuel to the fire.

Its Showtime. One win at a time.

 

[Hi-Low]

Until the actual Bracket comes out any "no clear path" talk makes little sense.

Upsets happen, regions open up, seeds matter as well.

 

[HuskyBoi]

When the time comes on Sunday, we will figure it out. But for now let's focus on getting a better seeding to hopefully make things easier long term

 

[Icehawk]

Can't read the article but "no clear path" does not feel right - I think there is a shot here for us. Of course we need to see how the BET goes and then how everyone seeds/brackets out...

 

[RayIsTheGOAT]

What is this article? I pay for ESPN+ and that was absolute dribble.

They basically suggest there’s 8 teams that can win. If there’s any year where there’s like 30 teams who can win, it’s this year.

 

[dennismenace]

Can't read the article but "no clear path" does not feel right - I think there is a shot here for us. Of course we need to see how the BET goes and then how everyone seeds/brackets out...

There's "no clear path" to read the stupid article without paying 5.99 from an allegedly "top writer". No thanks.

 

[dennismenace]

And with our depth time will be on our side if we stay close. There is a lot to not like about us if your an opponent.

 

[jibsey]

We all want better seeding because that supposedly equates to getting further down the road but at some point you have to just say blank it and beat whoever is in front of you no matter who they are. There is no shame in losing a wire game to a top seed. Hurley has to have them in a no fear, we can beat anyone mode.

 

[AD DB Burner]

What is this article? I pay for ESPN+ and that was absolute dribble.

They basically suggest there’s 8 teams that can win. If there’s any year where there’s like 30 teams who can win, it’s this year.

I couldn't agree more.

Absolute joke. Gassaway wrote more about the teams that just missed consideration than he did the eight teams that have a realistic chance of winning.

That being said, using the KenPom historical data where every team to win except UConn in 2014 was Top 20 in both adjusted Off and Def Efficiency, there are currently four teams that can win, plus UConn.

 

[RayRay]

He's not Dan Hurley, he's James Bouknight. Get it right

Definitely Bouknight!