Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sharris25, post: 4889602, member: 12151"] I disagree. Utah was probably the quickest team That SC would have seen and everyone else you could mention has the same dimensions of what South Carolina has played. Players who are All American types but do not have the bench or depth to stay with them. LSU on the road is as star studded as they come. UCLA was a team that seemed to be a heavyweight, but as time has passed I have seen them lose to teams with no height and their struggle even in a win against Fla. State seemed to put them back in the pack of a good team. Stanford would be a nice matchup, but they have no depth, and are extremely vulnerable when anyone in the starting five get into foul trouble, which is almost inevitable when playing SC this year. I think LSU on the road was tough in terms of opposing talent. Utah was tough in terms of a team where all five shoot the three, and all returners in experience level, and Uconn wsa tough in terms of a team with excellent coaching that has two All American type players with vast experience. I am not sure if there is a "heavyweight" that SC has not played that could bring anymore than what they have seen with thier schedule. Maybe Ohio St., but the height issue could make that game similar to some of their early season games against teams like UNC, who has more height or Duke on the road. [/QUOTE]