Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
More conference realignment Hunger Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Bone Dog, post: 4346520, member: 12088"] The whole question of whether there’s antitrust implications is suggestive of the disaster college football has become for all these schools. I’m not a lawyer either. I’m a college professor. So maybe my perspective will sound peculiar. It’s this line in particular that catches my attention. It’s not mistaken, but it is revealing. First, almost all of them are public institutions. I think this is what you meant to say, and it seems compelling. A public institution can’t really be accused of monopolizing a public interest. The public is essentially a monopoly, and must be so, as soon as it enters into any realm of business. Second, and more importantly, we should ask what the impact of football interests has been on institutions “whose primary agency is the business of education.” How can educational institutions [I]compete[/I] in education? That would be like competing in virtue or wisdom — we might think the very fact of the competition means the competitors have missed the point. Of course, we’re only talking about competition in sports, and this need not impact the educational mission. In respect of most sports, this is surely true. But a few sports, mainly football and basketball, have become essentially business interests within universities. Maybe the administrations and faculties of these schools can keep this interest separate from their primary educational agency. Of course, we all know that all these schools compete for national educational rankings as well. But the real question is whether a sports business has anything to contribute to an educational institution. Universities may be able to keep this business interest separate from their educational mission — spoiler alert: they mainly haven’t succeeded— but why should they have such an interest at all? We might as well ask if they should also maintain a hedge fund business within their enterprise. Don’t worry, I understand that schools get lots of money from sports, as well as from the hedge funds (read endowments) they maintain. Without them, they’d be a lot poorer. But they might just be better at that primary educational agency. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
More conference realignment Hunger Games
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom