- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 8,896
- Reaction Score
- 8,431
Money Nadness...growing gap
- Thread starter billybud
- Start date
So as the article states, most of the noticed effect is explained by Big East conference realignment into P5 conferences.
Using arbitrary endpoints, they arrived at the fact that non-P5+Big East are earning 3% less tournament credits than from previous dates.
Part of THAT is further explained by credit-earning teams who migrated into the new Big East and P5 by 2014 who are lumped in with that P5 + Big East number but who earned credits for the mid-majors before, like Xavier, Creighton, Butler, Utah, and TCU.
There were a total of 675 credits given out from 2014 until last year. TCU earned 1 credit, Utah earned 5, Butler earned 9, Creighton earned 4, and Xavier earned 12 in that time. That's 4.5% of the total number of credits.
Now, these teams may not have earned the same number of credits in mid-major leagues, but the fact that they accounted for 150% of the gap leads me to believe the effect is at least partially and likely mostly caused due to just the growth in number of the P5+Big East leagues.
Using arbitrary endpoints, they arrived at the fact that non-P5+Big East are earning 3% less tournament credits than from previous dates.
Part of THAT is further explained by credit-earning teams who migrated into the new Big East and P5 by 2014 who are lumped in with that P5 + Big East number but who earned credits for the mid-majors before, like Xavier, Creighton, Butler, Utah, and TCU.
There were a total of 675 credits given out from 2014 until last year. TCU earned 1 credit, Utah earned 5, Butler earned 9, Creighton earned 4, and Xavier earned 12 in that time. That's 4.5% of the total number of credits.
Now, these teams may not have earned the same number of credits in mid-major leagues, but the fact that they accounted for 150% of the gap leads me to believe the effect is at least partially and likely mostly caused due to just the growth in number of the P5+Big East leagues.