Mike Anthony: UConn's Case Against Kevin Ollie Firm By Contract Terms, Flimsy By Common Sense | The Boneyard

Mike Anthony: UConn's Case Against Kevin Ollie Firm By Contract Terms, Flimsy By Common Sense

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,024
Reaction Score
347,538
Mike playing the old Jeff Jacobs role:

Mike Anthony: UConn's Case Against Kevin Ollie Firm By Contract Terms, Flimsy By Common Sense

>>The cover-up, of course, is often worse than the crime and in this case it’s a reminder how Ollie comes across as consistently sloppy throughout his six-year tenure, either failing to grasp the gravity of what he was engaged in or thinking he COULD shrug off everything like he SHOULD shrug off a couple meaningless jump shots.<<

>>Both parties backed themselves into this complicated fiscal intersection of winning, losing, right, wrong, excuses and veiled motivations. Ollie did it with carelessness that appears to be woven into his pattern of behavior. UConn did it with the responsibility of having signed a contract with an albatross of a buyout, spending much of the past two years collecting information that ultimately would be used as tools to break free.

If the Huskies had continued to win under Ollie, UConn would be sending checks to some high profile Midwest law firm and helping its coach build a defense. Because the team started to lose, and continued losing, the university can play the angle that it has rid itself of a coach gone wrong and set a righteous path for the future of its program. But there is no middle ground and these battles begin before its participants even realize they are fully engaged.<<
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,024
Reaction Score
347,538
Not to be outdone: Jeff Jacobs: Arbitrator’s decision in Ollie-UConn case will not be easy

>>The rest is a steaming pile of stink that for three months has begged for the two sides to find a financial settlement. For the love of what is good and right for the state and the state university, swallow your legal egos, bury your self-righteousness, get in a room and find a number both sides can live with. Less Machiavelli in a Nike warmup suit. Please.<<

>>You read Article 10 and by the strictest letter, it’s impossible to see Ollie’s winning. The clause, with no provisions for severity or repeat offenses, was purposely written in broad fashion after UConn’s NCAA problems under Jim Calhoun. Benedict wrote in the letter to Ollie that it was structured by Herbst and former UConn AD Warde Manuel to enforce strict compliance. Zero tolerance. Zero money for Ollie.

Yet letter of the law vs. spirit of the law — a broader interpretation of what is right — has been argued for an eternity. Good grief. Shakespeare used it as a major theme.<<

>>You get the feeling outside of Connecticut and inside ESPN more folks are pulling for Ollie. But, hey, Ollie signed the contract with that clause and there are more than a few UConn fans, after the disaster of the last two years, who would argue Ollie getting all his money is a crime against basketball humanity.<<
 
Last edited:

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,610
Reaction Score
84,772
Both of these guys are out of their depth talking about this and it shows.
 

Online statistics

Members online
389
Guests online
2,110
Total visitors
2,499

Forum statistics

Threads
158,928
Messages
4,173,793
Members
10,043
Latest member
coolbeans44


.
Top Bottom