Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Scrutineer, post: 3042152, member: 8240"]
If I recall correctly, they didn't  change the rules, they just rushed to enforce them once UConn was the only major conference school that failed to meet the APR standards.

Indiana had failed to meet them (for three or four years) prior to UConn being sanctioned, and I believe Syracuse and Arkansas were among others that had failed in prior years but they were clear by the time the NCAA decided to punish UConn for, in my opinion, Calhoun not being contrite enough over the penalties from the Nate Miles case and one other issue.

I wish UConn had filed a suit for some good reason, like malicious prosecution, or something else that sounds good over the APR sanctions because of how the NCAA dismissed the fact that UConn met the standards if all the data had been considered. Why should UConn have been punished because other schools carefully massage their data before submitting it or come up with some other means to qualify they "student athletes" (get the Afro Studies program up and running etc.) or operate on a different calendar? uNC fought them and won.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach