Merl Code: "Nike schools pay too" | The Boneyard

Merl Code: "Nike schools pay too"

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,764
Reaction Score
143,893
'Nike schools pay too': Federal court docs allude to corruption involving flagship Nike basketball programs
But the filings also include snippets of evidence entered at trial, some of which revive an old, dormant question in the 16-month-old case.

Did other shoe companies beyond Adidas also buy players for their flagship schools?


Code, who worked for 14 years at industry leader Nike before moving to Adidas, said his former employer was in the business of brokering deals between basketball programs and recruits. “Nike schools pay too,” Code said in a conversation recorded by federal investigators on June 20, 2017. In the same conversation, Code names several of the most prominent programs in the country that are outfitted by Nike.

“It’s a corrupt space as it is and cheating is cheating,” Code is quoted as saying in the transcript. “Whether I give you a dollar, 100,000, or I get your mom and dad jobs, it’s cheating. … So in some form or fashion, Duke, North Carolina, Syracuse, Kentucky and all of the schools are doing something to help get kids. That’s just a part of the space.”
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,346
Reaction Score
22,589
And the success of these programs proves it is worth cheating. Heck, even Ville is in great shape from a recruiting and dollars point of view. We should have been cheating and if we were, we should have done a better job at cheating.
 

RayIsTheGOAT

Sticks, to the rafters
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
2,958
Reaction Score
20,689
Welp its been real guys. Might as well shut down the boneyard dot com
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2017
Messages
3,590
Reaction Score
9,190
Looks like we're so off the radar that we aren't mentioned among the Nike elite................elite cheaters anyway.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
1,451
Reaction Score
8,524
And the success of these programs proves it is worth cheating. Heck, even Ville is in great shape from a recruiting and dollars point of view. We should have been cheating and if we were, we should have done a better job at cheating.

If a school can't even figure its way through the APR without getting banned it should stay well clear of actual cheating. Best leave that to the pros.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
4,653
Reaction Score
14,053
If a school can't even figure its way through the APR without getting banned it should stay well clear of actual cheating. Best leave that to the pros.
To be fair they changed the rules mid-stream in order to whack us twice. And UHart did us no favors during that.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
3,470
Reaction Score
8,610
Anyone who didn't think every school (Nike, Adidas, under armor) cheats to some extent lives under a rock
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
58,994
Reaction Score
219,581
Where/how did UHart come into play?
Former University of Hartford president Walter Harrison was on the NCAA committee that decided to:
1) Change the APR rules and apply them retroactively to UConn
2) Punish UConn twice for the same APR scores
3) Refuse to include current UConn scores in the computation which would have let UConn pass the revised rules. The logic? "Not every school has had time to submit their up to date scores." What? Why should that matter when you are looking at UConn's scores?

The guy is incarnate evil. Second only to Emmert on the UConn fan "I hate that guy list."

1550343615646.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 5, 2017
Messages
3,590
Reaction Score
9,190
Former University of Hartford president Walter Harrison was on the NCAA committee that decided to:
1) Change the APR rules and apply them retroactively to UConn
2) Punish UConn twice for the same APR scores
3) Refuse to include current UConn scores in the computation which would have let UConn pass the revised rules. The logic? "Not every school has had time to submit their up to date scores." What? Why should that matter when you are looking at UConn's scores?

The guy is incarnate evil. Second only to Emmert on the UConn fan "I hate that guy list."

View attachment 39731

If I recall correctly, they didn't change the rules, they just rushed to enforce them once UConn was the only major conference school that failed to meet the APR standards.

Indiana had failed to meet them (for three or four years) prior to UConn being sanctioned, and I believe Syracuse and Arkansas were among others that had failed in prior years but they were clear by the time the NCAA decided to punish UConn for, in my opinion, Calhoun not being contrite enough over the penalties from the Nate Miles case and one other issue.

I wish UConn had filed a suit for some good reason, like malicious prosecution, or something else that sounds good over the APR sanctions because of how the NCAA dismissed the fact that UConn met the standards if all the data had been considered. Why should UConn have been punished because other schools carefully massage their data before submitting it or come up with some other means to qualify they "student athletes" (get the Afro Studies program up and running etc.) or operate on a different calendar? uNC fought them and won.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
28,935
Reaction Score
60,240
To be fair they changed the rules mid-stream in order to whack us twice. And UHart did us no favors during that.

Should have been reporting damn near 1.000 since the start. Like UK.

Actual grades/classes/attendance does not matter. Only what you report.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
1,451
Reaction Score
8,524
To be fair they changed the rules mid-stream in order to whack us twice. And UHart did us no favors during that.

For sure, but first there had to be some internal incompetence that made us vulnerable in the first place. We seem to be doing fine now that someone is finally paying attention.
 

Edward Sargent

Sargelak
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,818
Reaction Score
9,685
Former University of Hartford president Walter Harrison was on the NCAA committee that decided to:
1) Change the APR rules and apply them retroactively to UConn
2) Punish UConn twice for the same APR scores
3) Refuse to include current UConn scores in the computation which would have let UConn pass the revised rules. The logic? "Not every school has had time to submit their up to date scores." What? Why should that matter when you are looking at UConn's scores?

The guy is incarnate evil. Second only to Emmert on the UConn fan "I hate that guy list."

View attachment 39731
That guy is Emmert's lover
 

Online statistics

Members online
324
Guests online
1,864
Total visitors
2,188

Forum statistics

Threads
158,904
Messages
4,172,962
Members
10,043
Latest member
coolbeans44


.
Top Bottom