Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="j66kicker, post: 3608773, member: 4447"] The portion of the population which [I][U]has[/U][/I] it ("1 in 150 [I]have[/I] it") is a lot different than the portion of those [I][U]tested[/U][/I] who test positive ("3.3m out of 40m [I]tested[/I] tested positive"). FWIW 1/150 (= .67%) is a little less than 3.3 mil/328 mil USA population (=1.0%) but in the same ballpark. So if the total positive tests represent 67% of the total cases [I]currently active[/I], then the "1/150 have it" would be spot on. No way to say exactly, but the 1/150 is certainly plausible. [/QUOTE]