Mechelle Voepel blog on the UConn-SJU game | The Boneyard

Mechelle Voepel blog on the UConn-SJU game

Status
Not open for further replies.

HuskyNan

You Know Who
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
26,063
Reaction Score
215,573
Will this loss hurt UConn? That’s unlikely. It will give Huskies fans something different to full-bore obsess over – gee, maybe the team does miss Maya Moore just a little, huh? - and it will irritate the players, who want no part of losing anywhere, but especially not at home.

Saturday again proved, though, it really can happen to anybody.

Geez, Mechelle, stop being realistic, will you? You can wake up, St. John's, it wasn't a dream
 

JS

Moderator
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
2,001
Reaction Score
9,695
Will this loss hurt UConn? That's unlikely. It will give Huskies fans sometehing different to full-bore obsess over.
Since when did we full-bore obsess?

We just have some core beliefs, such as that UConn should always win -- always -- and we might discuss at some length -- OK, at extraordinary length -- how long all this winning may go on.

In the view of some of our more optimistic members, the Huskies' ability to keep winning all the time may stretch for hundreds of games. The more reasonable among us think it'll go on merely indefinitely, with no numbers attached.

So all of this fixation on continued victories may create a false impression we're just obsessed with winning. Nothing could be further from the truth.

We're also fixated on losses -- not only on how they'll be put off for a long time by all the winning but especially, on those rare occasions that they occur, why it happened.

A loss has varied elements that are endlessly fascinating, at least to us, as befits a debate akin to one over why the sun one fine morning suddenly rose in the west.

When you have to marshal explanations why this happened when it couldn't happen, and then you have to hold forth on how you saw it coming despite your endless prior obsessing over how it wouldn't likely happen -- well, hoo boy, convolution reigns.

Now add in that your theories and reasons for what the sun did will differ from others' reasons, and a third group will be mad at all of you critics for being silly when everything's fine and the sun is warm no matter where it rises from, and you have the makings of wonderful conflict within an overall obsessive format.

I know, you're thinking all this makes Ms. Voepel's case -- that a loss gives us "something different to full-bore obsess over."

But I beg to differ. Our obsessing is never fully boring.

Just remember, Ms. Voepel, obsessive can be a synonym for fanatical. And fanatics can be shortened to fans.

Yes, we're crazy obsessives wallowing in obsessive discussions of winning and not losing and why our team does and doesn't and won't unless it does and why.

But that doesn't add up to fully boring. To the contrary, crazy is rarely boring, at least to connoisseurs of it.

And that's us fans.

But, it's late, and I'll sign off with the thought that if the sun comes up tomorrow in the same weird place it did this morning, somebody better post a good explanation here. With which I may disagree.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
675
Reaction Score
228
Since when did we full-bore obsess?

We just have some core beliefs, such as that UConn should always win -- always -- and we might discuss at some length -- OK, at extraordinary length -- how long all this winning may go on.

In the view of some of our more optimistic members, the Huskies' ability to keep winning all the time may stretch for hundreds of games. The more reasonable among us think it'll go on merely indefinitely, with no numbers attached.

So all of this fixation on continued victories may create a false impression we're just obsessed with winning. Nothing could be further from the truth.

We're also fixated on losses -- not only on how they'll be put off for a long time by all the winning but especially, on those rare occasions that they occur, why it happened.

A loss has varied elements that are endlessly fascinating, at least to us, as befits a debate akin to one over why the sun one fine morning suddenly rose in the west.

When you have to marshal explanations why this happened when it couldn't happen, and then you have to hold forth on how you saw it coming despite your endless prior obsessing over how it wouldn't likely happen -- well, hoo boy, convolution reigns.

Now add in that your theories and reasons for what the sun did will differ from others' reasons, and a third group will be mad at all of you critics for being silly when everything's fine and the sun is warm no matter where it rises from, and you have the makings of wonderful conflict within an overall obsessive format.

I know, you're thinking all this makes Ms. Voepel's case -- that a loss gives us "something different to full-bore obsess over."

But I beg to differ. Our obsessing is never fully boring.

Just remember, Ms. Voepel, obsessive can be a synonym for fanatical. And fanatics can be shortened to fans.

Yes, we're crazy obsessives wallowing in obsessive discussions of winning and not losing and why our team does and doesn't and won't unless it does and why.

But that doesn't add up to fully boring. To the contrary, crazy is rarely boring, at least to connoisseurs of it.

And that's us fans.

But, it's late, and I'll sign off with the thought that if the sun comes up tomorrow in the same weird place it did this morning, somebody better post a good explanation here. With which I may disagree.
Thanks for a prime example of full-bore obsess!
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
673
Reaction Score
1,018
Will this loss hurt UConn? That’s unlikely. It will give Huskies fans something different to full-bore obsess over – gee, maybe the team does miss Maya Moore just a little, huh? - and it will irritate the players, who want no part of losing anywhere, but especially not at home.

Saturday again proved, though, it really can happen to anybody.

Geez, Mechelle, stop being realistic, will you? You can wake up, St. John's, it wasn't a dream

Will this loss hurt UConn? That’s unlikely. It will give Huskies fans something different to full-bore obsess over – gee, maybe the team does miss Maya Moore just a little, huh? - and it will irritate the players, who want no part of losing anywhere, but especially not at home.

Saturday again proved, though, it really can happen to anybody.

Geez, Mechelle, stop being realistic, will you? You can wake up, St. John's, it wasn't a dream
Not one of the so called basketball experts has even questioned how an unguarded 3pt. play could have occured in that situation. If that happened in any men's game , that is what would have be criticized over and over again! Not one "expert" took the time to break down the defensive alignment to show what happened. Just to say it was blown coverage is BS. You allow anything but a 3pt. play in that situation. PERIOD!
 

Icebear

Andlig Ledare
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,784
Reaction Score
19,227
Not one of the so called basketball experts has even questioned how an unguarded 3pt. play could have occured in that situation. If that happened in any men's game , that is what would have be criticized over and over again! Not one "expert" took the time to break down the defensive alignment to show what happened. Just to say it was blown coverage is BS. You allow anything but a 3pt. play in that situation. PERIOD!
Who was going to do that? There was no coverage of that type at the end of the game as CPTV came on with the fundraising. So just because it wasn't done doesn't mean it wasn't possible to do. Your question is more about the lack of attention given to women's basketball than about whether it was a blown coverage or not. Again I ask you what is your definition of blown coverage because that is exactly what I saw and what CD said happened. Tiff was confused and in the wrong coverage. She was supposed to be on the perimeter guarding the kid who took the wide open shot. The person assigned to guard that person on the perimeter wasn't there.
 

Ozzie Nelson

RIP, Ozzie
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,247
Reaction Score
4,604
Thanks for promising to bust if UConn doesn't win the NC.

Way I figure it, one out of two ain't bad.

That is the POD...Post of The Day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
317
Guests online
2,546
Total visitors
2,863

Forum statistics

Threads
160,164
Messages
4,219,544
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom