Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 2004276, member: 7492"] Having been trained in 6 Sigma, the sample size of 93 respondents is insignificant as it lends itself to direct biases of audience, voter reoccurrence, voter ignorance and article preamble that may have already "poisoned" the poll. Is the process perfect? It's subjective so of course the process isn't perfect. As noted, McDonald's is driven by a game so it needs two rosters of logical positions-PG, SG, SF, PF, C. One of the things I have noticed in watching WCBB these past 17 years is the Travel Team players have more polish to their games and can contribute almost immediately-Crystal Dangerfield vs. Kyla as an example. It is pretty tough for non-travel to catch up on game speed, travel and intensity in the first half or even the first full season of College hoop. Also 3 of the options already assess "Talent" in their evaluations- travel teams will only take their view of talent, colleges only sign their view of talent and National Rankings like Prospect Nation, Hoop Gurlz or USA Basketball all try their hand at assessing. Also note some peak early, some peak late, some lose interest and some suffer injuries that limit their development. Seems to me that KLS, Asia Durr, Napheesa were all top 10 coming out and have shown me they were Evaluated correctly. Lauren Cox, Crystal Dangerfield and Joyner Holmes from last year also look like the real deals. [/QUOTE]