- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 190
- Reaction Score
- 242
Looks like he may be leading Division 1 in rushing attempts. Question is....can he keep it up?
I think you make 2 very good observations.I give a ton of credit to McCombs, who is developing into an above average running back (who unfortunately is also a well below average pass blocking running back). His improvement has been apparent. Previously he had been trying to stretch plays out, but I rarely see that now. HE runs up the middle with little wasted motion. Great to see a back improve like that.
He has improved running the ball, but his blocking, if it doesn't get worked out, will result in him not seeing as much playing time in the near future.
Agreed that it's not good for any back, let alone a small one, to get 25+ carries a game, but I think that is a reflection their perception of our options at RB at this point. I am guessing they figure it's worth risking him wearing down/getting injured, because they can't see us winning with him touching the ball fewer than 25 times a game anyway. That's my guess.I'm worried about the possibility of a breakdown.....can he keep up the 25 carries a game pace? Is coach putting him at risk for a late season breakdown?
We need somebody BIGGER to compliment him.. Hard to believe we don't have a guy on the roster capable of doing this...
Agreed that it's not good for any back, let alone a small one, to get 25+ carries a game, but I think that is a reflection their perception of our options at RB at this point. I am guessing they figure it's worth risking him wearing down/getting injured, because they can't see us winning with him touching the ball fewer than 25 times a game anyway. That's my guess.
I'm worried about the possibility of a breakdown.....can he keep up the 25 carries a game pace? Is coach putting him at risk for a late season breakdown?
Good point-there are certainly more than just isolated examples of small RB's that carry the load over the long haul. I guess I mean more that they have less muscle mass to absorb the blows, not that they'll necessarily get "worn down" quicker than a big back, and this can potentially lead to nagging injuries. But then again I suppose the counter to having less muscle mass to absorb hits from defenders is the idea that smaller backs tend to make sure they take less full-on hits than bigger backs. I guess I don't know what I'm talking about. That's normal for me, so I'm comfortable with that!I think that the carries issue in regards to a smaller running back is completely overrated. Completely. A bigger back has just as much a chance of running out of gas as a smaller back. Look at the backs that have carried big loads recently - Jaquizz Rogers, Ronnie Hillman . . . etc.
Agree with everything here and I have to eat a little crow. I did not believe he could play the kind of game he did yesterday between the tackles. Nor did I believe he would hold up this well at his size.
His pass blocking is non-existant. JJL did look good yesterday and pass blocks very well. I think we see more of him.
One thing I notice a couple of times during the game and saw about seven times while rewatching it during power hour was that we did quite a bit of guard pulling on running plays yesterday (each was quite effective). This is how we ran for the prior half dozen years but for some reason (Deleone's philosophy?) was scrapped for this season until yesterday. I hope that we will go back to something we had done very well in the recent past.