Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DefenseBB, post: 3333261, member: 7492"] While giving feedback to my fine colleague [USER=7443]@SCspur[/USER] about whether SC is a good defensive team based on who they played, I went to Massey (still to early to really gauge but it has some relevance) and noted some rather “soft” teams at #314, #213, #324 on their OOC. Whereas UConn has #84, #76, #71, #68, #67,#63 #41 As our worst teams on our OOC. Our conference has 4 pathetic teams at #282, #236, #208 and #200 that we have to play. So the notion we might have to schedule tougher is somewhat valid. That said, some schools take it to extremes and I must apologize to all the SC faithful as you are one of the better ones (still though #300+ teams???) MSU should be EMBARRASSED #172, #166, #240, #249, #261 plus #126, #133, #136. Maryland has 317, 244, 232, 271, plus GW at #143 (Jen- what the heck?) Baylor has #312, #266, #322, #264, #201, #163 Tenn has #214, #270, #311, #212, #344, #284, #203,#202,#287 SERIOUSLY? I will believe in Coach Jolly when she stops this pathetic OOC romp. Not her fault yet so... I get some teams play former assistants or schools close to a player on their team so some rankings can’t be helped but the degree the above teams schedule is pathetic as they should be leading the way as top programs should- ND, Stanford, Louisville, even USF. For the fans of the above teams don’t even try to justify that many cupcakes on your schedule. You want to be considered elite, act like it. Head bang [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,444

Messages: 4,396,528

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl