Maya Moore's, New Player Tribune Feature | The Boneyard

Maya Moore's, New Player Tribune Feature

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,482
Reaction Score
60,735
Interesting. Nice to see her involved. And I remember Stackhouse from back in the day. Liked watching him play at UNC.

One thing that stuck out for me though was they didn't say if Irons was (or if they thought he was) innocent or "not guilty", but rather he wasn't prosecuted correctly. Which does have some merit to it. Though I am not a big fan of the guilty going free because of a technicality. I understand it, just not a fan of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
939
Reaction Score
4,810
Maya is something special. Such a tremendous role model for young women.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,416
Reaction Score
69,891
Interesting. Nice to see her involved. And I remember Stackhouse from back in the day. Liked watching him play at UNC.

One thing that stuck out for me though was they didn't say if Irons was (or if they thought he was) innocent or "not guilty", but rather he wasn't prosecuted correctly. Which does have some merit to it. Though I am not a big fan of the guilty going free because of a technicality. I understand it, just not a fan of it.
Maya states that he was "wrongfully convicted." They would mean that he is (or she believes him to be) factually innocent.

Prosecutorial misconduct is not about technicalities. A system that does not guard against prosecutorial misconduct can provide no certainty that those convicted of crimes are actually guilty of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
Interesting . Nice to see her involved. And I remember Stackhouse from back in the day. Liked watching him play at UNC.

One thing that stuck out for me though was they didn't say if Irons was (or if they thought he was) innocent or "not guilty", but rather he wasn't prosecuted correctly. Which does have some merit to it. Though I am not a big fan of the guilty going free because of a technicality. I understand it, just not a fan of it.
\]
The thing about Justice , I mean law justice, not moral justice, is that if those prosecuting don't apply the law evenly (fairness is not always evident) then we are all possible victims. Because the terms Moral and Fairness mean different things to people in different circumstances it's near impossible to apply for all. But the law should not stop seeking that goal.
Legal results can be frustrating--hope Maya knows that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,482
Reaction Score
60,735
Maya states that he was "wrongfully convicted." They would mean that he is (or she believes him to be) factually innocent.

Prosecutorial misconduct is not about technicalities. A system that does not guard against prosecutorial misconduct can provide no certainty that those convicted of crimes are actually guilty of them.
No, not really. Not really what they said. He may be innocent. But he may be guilty also, just wrongly prosecuted. Or poorly prosecuted. That's the way they made it sound.
\]
The thing about Justice , I mean law justice, not moral justice, is that if those prosecuting don't apply the law evenly (fairness is not always evident) then we are all possible victims. Because the terms Moral and Fairness mean different things to people in different circumstances it's near impossible to apply for all. But the law should not stop seeking that goal.
Legal results can be frustrating--hope Maya knows that.
Oh, like I said I understand. However if Justice (not just law Justice, but actual Justice) wins out, then there are no victims. If we rely on law Justice, then there can be victims.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
No, not really. Not really what they said. He may be innocent. But he may be guilty also, just wrongly prosecuted. Or poorly prosecuted. That's the way they made it sound.

Oh, like I said I understand. However if Justice (not just law Justice, but actual Justice) wins out, then there are no victims. If we rely on law Justice, then there can be victims.

The only justice that can be controlled is LAW justice. Back in the old west Justice it was crowd justice--how well did that work?
If the world, and in this new world is more true, people think the courts or Congressional Bills produce the justice they seek--won't happen. Congress produces Knee Jerk bill/law--which clutter the law books with little no value except emotional. Our states and Feds could erase 90 percent of all law, we as citizens would be safer from frivolous prosecution, and we wouldn't miss them. There will ALWAY's be victims--real victims and those who perceive themselves as Victims--it's like the poor, they shall, as the bible say, always be with us. Justice, Like perfection it is unattainable. .
Only God can give true justice--even then I don't always agree with the decisions.
 

msf22b

Maestro
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,281
Reaction Score
16,910
I really like it that Maya is becoming an activist.
There's a lot for her to do when her BB career is over.
 

Online statistics

Members online
402
Guests online
2,166
Total visitors
2,568

Forum statistics

Threads
158,959
Messages
4,175,317
Members
10,046
Latest member
Wilson


.
Top Bottom