Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="nelsonmuntz, post: 5210475, member: 833"]
The ACC is a weird league too for tournament selection.  Its results against the other majors are pretty bed, but SMU and UNC are clearly bubble teams despite both having problematic resumes.  UNC's resume is mostly a collection of quality losses that were not blowouts, while SMU does not have a single win over a P5+MWC+WCC team that will play in the NCAA Tournament.  UNC has 1 win over a P5+WCC+MWC team that will play in the tournament, and is 1-10 against Quad 1 with several close losses.  Both teams have a decent shot of picking up 3 more wins before Selection Sunday.

Boise is 3-5 against Quad 1 with a NET of 43 that is not terrible.

Cincinnati has a 40 NET, but is 1-10 vs. Quad 1.  Cincinnati's resume is as strong as it is because it didn't play a lot of terrible teams.

Texas and Arkansas are 4-9 vs. Quad 1, and Oklahoma is 5-10, but they all have losing records against Quads 1 and 2 combined.

I don't know how the committee is going to treat any of that.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach