Kind of what he did at STM. People here talking about how he’s good because of StM days - he shot 37% from the field last year. The expectation when Hurley took him couldn’t have been what he was at StM because he was anything but efficient. It was more about his skillset and potential. Both him and Reed are reclamation projects. Season still young. What Reed has going for him is that he’s a beast. He has physical traits that stand out. AM doesn’t have that at all, it would be based on IQ and skills.Seems like he drives iso or passes around the perimeter. Hope he figures it out, but he’s been here for 6 months. Color me doubtful
That seems like a disaster against actual competition.It would be Solo Ball at PG bringing the ball up, so yes
I agree about Nowell. With so many people going on about how good he's been and that he should be in the PG rotation, I keep trying to find what I've been missing because I don't see it. Don't get me wrong, I like him and think he will be a great player for us, but what I see is a competent, promising freshman, not a kid who is ready to take the reins of a top 10 team.I understand the rose colored glasses about Nowell given his rep coming out of Philly. But I'm not really seeing anything special right now. He has gotten a little run at the point, close to 8 minutes a game, 31 minutes total, three quarters of a full 40. He has 3 assists and 2 TOs. His defense isn't anything special.
To me, he looks like a freshman getting his feet wet. Comparing him to Mahaney who has a 9-1 TO/Assist ratio isn't fair to either. Mahaney is the better player and will be for some time. Nowell is promising and the more minutes he gets the faster he will progress but that's about it for now.
Not sure that’s the solution either - Solo is good at many things, his handle not so much. Always looks loose to me. He’s got such long arms it almost feels like he just can’t keep the ball close to his body.It would be Solo Ball at PG bringing the ball up, so yes
Not saying I'm in favor of it, I'd just keep starting Mahaney. That's just what Hurley has saidThat seems like a disaster against actual competition.
It seems like the major reason for Mahaney is lack of TOs. But his passing seems poor (did he feed any lobs, cuts to the hoop?) and the offense is stagnant when he is initiating. I think Hass was trying to force some passes last night..hence the TOs. I’d like to keep seeing Nowell getting real reps. Give Hass 25min and split the restMahaney is not a dynamic PG, which is why he was moved off the ball last year by Randy Bennett --but Danny has said repeatedly he does not want two small guards. He wants more Ross and Ball at the 2, and McNeeley is going to get his 30 min at 3. On a team with 19 turnovers, a PG with none of them could do worse. The shooting will improve, and last night the lobs into the 5's were problematic only because the 5's couldn't hold onto the ball.
Hurley has said himself we are missing passes. The guards arent making them. You dont have to call him a point guard but we need a guard that can make passes.Does our offense need a true PG? I get you want the best ball handlers (else why are they called 'guards') bringing up the ball against pesky defenders, but once we cross half court we literally can pass to anyone and have them pass to anyone.
Each set has multiple options, so a "PG" could get a layup from a Center's pass. This is positionless basketball where assists are spread out on the whole team. AM has what Newton has in the ability to see the defense and see what mismatches can be shaped by the movement of the offense - but that doesn't mean AM is going to be the one with the assist or the basket.
What Newton had that AM does not have is the ability to create his own shot, shoot over smaller guards, and be as valuable a shooter as anyone else. AM might get there with his shooting, but not creating his own shot. This does not make him a Joey Calcaterra clone as Cali was a sharpshooter. It also does not make him a Spencer clone as Cam had quicker reactions than most with a high game IQ to go with that. Maheney is good, great against better teams, but that might be his ceiling. Time will tell.
I’d say this group does yes. This team feels a little rudderless offensively. As someone mentioned this a more of a collection of great shooters, not a lot of natural playmakers. There’s also not enough crisp team passing/sets to make up for it. Solo is really just a shooter offensively at this point. Liam and AK put the ball on the floor with one direction.Does our offense need a true PG? I get you want the best ball handlers (else why are they called 'guards') bringing up the ball against pesky defenders, but once we cross half court we literally can pass to anyone and have them pass to anyone.
Each set has multiple options, so a "PG" could get a layup from a Center's pass. This is positionless basketball where assists are spread out on the whole team. AM has what Newton has in the ability to see the defense and see what mismatches can be shaped by the movement of the offense - but that doesn't mean AM is going to be the one with the assist or the basket.
What Newton had that AM does not have is the ability to create his own shot, shoot over smaller guards, and be as valuable a shooter as anyone else. AM might get there with his shooting, but not creating his own shot. This does not make him a Joey Calcaterra clone as Cali was a sharpshooter. It also does not make him a Spencer clone as Cam had quicker reactions than most with a high game IQ to go with that. Maheney is good, great against better teams, but that might be his ceiling. Time will tell.
The past two years we had Newton and another elite playmaker in the offense. It was much easier to play “position less” basketball because we realistically had guys who can play multiple positions.Does our offense need a true PG? I get you want the best ball handlers (else why are they called 'guards') bringing up the ball against pesky defenders, but once we cross half court we literally can pass to anyone and have them pass to anyone.
Each set has multiple options, so a "PG" could get a layup from a Center's pass. This is positionless basketball where assists are spread out on the whole team. AM has what Newton has in the ability to see the defense and see what mismatches can be shaped by the movement of the offense - but that doesn't mean AM is going to be the one with the assist or the basket.
What Newton had that AM does not have is the ability to create his own shot, shoot over smaller guards, and be as valuable a shooter as anyone else. AM might get there with his shooting, but not creating his own shot. This does not make him a Joey Calcaterra clone as Cali was a sharpshooter. It also does not make him a Spencer clone as Cam had quicker reactions than most with a high game IQ to go with that. Maheney is good, great against better teams, but that might be his ceiling. Time will tell.
Maybe folks see the conversation is more important that appeasing the Boneyard spelling nazis . You and Hooper an alliance walking around her with your patrol sticks? Maybe this calls for a Boneyard spelling bee!!!When the title of the thread has the players named misspelled and no one calls it out after two pages of posts seems like we have more on our minds related to how this will pan out compared to the usual stuff.
Thanks RoughRoughMaybe folks see the conversation is more important that appeasing the Boneyard spelling nazis . You and Hooper an alliance walking around her with your patrol sticks? Maybe this calls for a Boneyard spelling bee!!!
I agree with your premise: Hurley likes experience. He gave TN all the rope in the world.....but while he was struggling with his shot, he was still playing quality D and distributing the ball. Mahaney is doing neither of these things. And he isn't 6'4".At this point, I don’t think Mahaney is in jeopardy of losing his starting position. Yes, he’s had some struggles but he’s in his third year and Hurley likes to play talented players with experience. He’s played against plenty of good teams the past two seasons and has proven that he can play against any level of opponent. This alone should be a plus now that we will be playing better competition.
To me, he’s just pressing to hard. Rushing shots when he didn’t have to, not squaring up when he’s had time to. Last night he had a nice squared up 3 in the first half that he sunk and another attempt in the second half at the top of the key that he rushed and was not squared up on when he had time to b/c his man was caught in a pick.
Ross also rushed shots. He aired a wide open three and then a few minutes later swished a corner 3 when he took time to square up, bend his knees and get arch on the ball.
I’d also like to see some uptempo ball with more fast break opportunities where Mahaney could take it end to end or spot up on the wing for an open three.
I think they will both settle down and start being more efficient with Mahaney showing quicker results than Ross.
What are you talking about?When the title of the thread has the players named misspelled and no one calls it out after two pages of posts seems like we have more on our minds related to how this will pan out compared to the usual stuff.