I'd be curious to know how Connecticut and/or Louisiana taxpayers feel about these salaries. From what I can tell,
the LSU AD runs in the green, so arguably they can afford this - overall. But my guess is the LSU women's team is still running a net deficit (especially now), as is the UConn women's team (
to say nothing of the UConn AD overall).
I ask this because I'm an alum of both Stanford and Cal (and a California taxpayer), and while I'm comfortable with Stanford spending as much as it wants on athletics, I question how schools like Cal and UCLA hire and fire coaches and churn through so much money on facilities, etc., when the net effect is huge deficits that, directly or indirectly, are borne by taxpayers.
Needless to say, Geno is more than worth his salary in terms of the prestige and recognition he has brought to the UConn women's team. At the same time, it's hard to swallow $2-3m salaries for public employees in states like
Connecticut and
Louisiana that are both forecasted to have significant deficits and huge unfunded mandates over the next few years. Do taxpayers in CT or LA care, or is this just the "cost of doing business"?