Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 2508121, member: 3535"] 1-- You use the word "OR." Who says it is "OR?" And if it isn't "OR" and it's just for example "[B]the 4 greatest PLayers of all time" [/B]then how does bringing up "most improtant recruit" have any meaning? It is irrelevant, right? [B] -- if you were to use the objective of [B]the 4 greatest PLayers of all time? [/B][/B] 2-- So you think winning had nothing to do with it? If Geno was 5-25 - you think she comes anyway? In that interview that you heard, you're confident that looking back Rebecca and what was quoted and what you heard was the complete thought process that Rebecca could perfectly recall? And don't you think when she spoke of why she came to UCONN because of Gneo is that they also shared the same "[B]drive"[/B] to win? How would "winning" have looked without the final four? She speaks of a "basketball decision." THAT basketball decision is in part on winning, right? **I just want to add -- I don't know. I asked the question about Bascom. I don't think it can be disregarded though. Your opinion is no. That's fine. As for me, I think winning defines Rebecca and it would or might have been back then too. She liked Geno because they both wanted to win too. That's a logical assumption, right? Or do you think it was all about "Rebecca?" Thus I won't be shocked like some of you are that Rebecca be left off the top 4-- or whatever "Rushmore" means. Some might not consider her 4 best players. 3 - Yet some give credit to Rebecca being the single most important recruit. As I've asked before which I have yet to get an answer-- "what does that mean?" Before you get to win a championship, you need to get to a Final Four. How many coaches not part of the big programs get the elit/top tier recruits without going tot he final four 1st? 4-- See olddude's response from above. In addition is Rebecca also getting in because of her broadcasting? [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach