You could also argue that if 4 BE teams didn't play each other in the second round none would have advanced.
This is something people were saying at the time. The BE, despite the record-setting 11 bids and us winning the championship, roundly embarrassed itself in the Tournament. Since I have nothing better to do, allow me to refresh your memory:
(9) Villanova - Lost a close game in the first round; not an upset, but losing a tossup game isn't great
(5) WVU - Avoided the dreaded 5/12 upset, but fell to UK in round 2; similar story to Nova
(11) Marquette - Upset Xavier and Syracuse to reach the S16, but was thoroughly uncompetitive against UNC; the second of 2 bright spots
(3) Syracuse - Upset by Marquette; kind of a wash for the conference given the above result
(6) Cincy - Handled Missouri and then lost to us in round 2; acquitted themselves well
(3) UConn - 'nuff said
This is where it starts getting ugly:
(4) 'Ville - Upset by Morehead State in the first round; thoroughly embarrassing
(6) G'Town - Blown out in the first round by VCU; thoroughly embarrassing
(2) ND - Blown out in the second round by Florida State; thoroughly embarrassing
(1) Pitt - We all know what happened there
(6) St. John's - Blown out by Gonzaga in the first round; thoroughly embarrassing
So we're looking at one national champion (us), two teams that marginally disappointed (Nova, WVU), one team that overachieved (MU), one that underachieved (SU), one that did about as well as expected (Cincy); those seem about a net neutral. But then you have 5 teams who lost to teams at least 5 seeds beneath them, and 3 of those weren't even competitive.
We had basically 1.5 teams in the Sweet 16, out of the 11 who started in the field.